Issue 63644

Summary:

WW8: conditional text not exported

Product:

Writer

Reporter:

klute <klute>

Component:

save-export

Assignee:

michael.ruess

Status:

CLOSED DUPLICATE

QA Contact:

issues@sw <issues>

Severity:

Trivial

Priority:

CC:

issues, lars_o_hansen

Version:

OOo 2.0.2

Keywords:

oooqa

Target Milestone:

---

Hardware:

OS:

Linux, all

Issue Type:

DEFECT

Latest Confirmation in:

---

Developer Difficulty:

---

Attachments:

Description	Flags
Original text document containing the conditional text	none
Exported Word file where the conditional text is missing	none

Description klute 2006-03-26 13:44:19 UTC

Conditional text is not exported to Micro$oft Word 97/2000/XP. The conditional
fields are simply missing in the exported document. Or at least they are missing
when I reopen the Word document with OOo.

Comment 1 klute 2006-03-26 13:46:07 UTC

Created attachment 35267 [details]
Original text document containing the conditional text

Comment 2 klute 2006-03-26 13:47:45 UTC

Created attachment 35268 [details]
Exported Word file where the conditional text is missing

Comment 3 lars 2006-03-26 15:36:18 UTC

confirmed with 680_m160 on WinXP Pro SP2

Comment 4 michael.ruess 2006-03-27 11:24:44 UTC

Known problem, see issue 56904.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 56904 ***

Comment 5 michael.ruess 2006-03-27 11:26:41 UTC

Closing duplicate.

Comment 6 klute 2006-04-10 08:09:56 UTC

I think I have a suitable testcase now to reproduce the problem reliably with
OOo 2.0.2. At least I did the following twice and got the error both times:

1. Open the attached file Testdocument_okay.odt.
2. Note that there's a large logo graphics at the upper right and a small one at
the lower left of the first page.
3. Place the cursor before the word "Copy" on the first page. Hit the [RETURN]
key until the word "Copy" is moved to the second page.
4. Save the document to a new file.
5. Close the document.
6. Open the file saved in step 4.
7. Note that the images mentioned in step 2 are missing.

Comment 7 klute 2006-04-10 08:23:29 UTC

Oops, reopened the wrong issue - sorry. Could someone in charge please close it?
Thanks!

Comment 8 lars 2006-04-10 12:12:24 UTC

resolving as duplicate again (even though I'm not in charge)

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 56904 ***

Comment 9 lars 2006-04-10 12:13:07 UTC

closing as duplicate