Issue 68352

Summary:

German English ?

Product:

General

Reporter:

mmeeks <mmeeks>

Component:

Assignee:

thorsten.martens

Status:

CLOSED FIXED

QA Contact:

issues@framework <issues>

Severity:

Trivial

Priority:

CC:

christian.jansen, issues, khirano, Mathias_Bauer, pmladek

Version:

680m181

Target Milestone:

OOo 2.3

Hardware:

All

OS:

Linux, all

Issue Type:

PATCH

Latest Confirmation in:

---

Developer Difficulty:

---

Issue Depends on:

65325

Issue Blocks:

Attachments:

Description	Flags
patch	none

Description mmeeks 2006-08-10 15:21:09 UTC

The English in the recovery dialog is sufficiently strained to be noticably
broken [ I have an internal bug filed about this ].

The attached patch cleans up at least those parts that we see; Any chance it can
be fed into the i18n system (however that works ? :-)

Thanks.

Comment 1 mmeeks 2006-08-10 15:21:48 UTC

Created attachment 38420 [details]
patch

Comment 2 pmladek 2006-08-10 16:40:07 UTC

The patch depends on the one attached to the issue #65325. Anyway, I think that
they should be commited at once.

Comment 3 pavel 2006-08-11 16:17:38 UTC

Ivo: who is approving changes in en-US strings? iano?

Comment 4 ivo.hinkelmann 2006-08-11 18:10:13 UTC

lutz, for you?

Comment 5 lutz.hoeger 2006-08-31 07:11:05 UTC

I am not sure if Liz would be happy about the summary, because as one of our
native (English) speakers she did the English version of these messages. ;-)

But anyway, I agree to most of the proposed changes, with one exception. In my
opinion, the "will now start to recover" piece is plain wrong. In German and in
English. At the time the user reads this sentence, the recovery process is
already running. In many cases the process is done before the user has finished
reading. So I would like to have a different wording here.

Christian, please can you make all this go into the right spec and forward it to
engineering?

Comment 6 christian.jansen 2006-11-23 16:53:54 UTC

CJ->FL: Please have a look at this issue. I think this could be fixed together
with the rewording of the "cancel" button.

Comment 7 clippka 2007-05-10 10:15:24 UTC

changed component, drawing is obviously wrong

Comment 8 Mathias_Bauer 2007-05-14 19:49:51 UTC

Frank, Christian, please make sure that this fairly trivial patch is either
accepted or rejected for 2.3. I don't see any reason why this should last any
longer.

Comment 9 frank.loehmann 2007-05-15 09:24:15 UTC

FL->AS: We should integrate this fix without changes and without the proposed
button text changes, because we have already agreed to talk about the current
document recovery process for the next major release. Then we could solve other
open issues like dialog modality which is currently blocking OOo and sometimes
unwanted recovery of document files.

Comment 10 Mathias_Bauer 2007-06-06 11:34:12 UTC

Michael, are you fine with Frank's change not to change the text of the button?

Comment 11 mmeeks 2007-06-06 12:47:49 UTC

mba - sure; the button changes were suggested as an extension bu cj; getting the
patch in as-is sounds perfect :-)
Thanks.

Comment 12 andreas.schluens 2007-06-07 08:35:54 UTC

AS->mmeeks: I've added your patch to cws [ fwk66 ] ... but your base 1.14 was a
little bit outdated .-) So I've applied the patch manually ... and not
completely. As you can see inside the source the resource
"STR_RECOVERYONLY_DESCR" does not exists any longer. It was replaced by another
patch send by kendy. see issue #65325# for further information

Comment 13 mmeeks 2007-06-15 10:20:14 UTC

thanks; much appreciated :-)

Comment 14 andreas.schluens 2007-06-21 11:29:15 UTC

AS->TM: Please verify this issue on cws [fwk66]. THX.

Comment 15 andreas.schluens 2007-06-21 11:29:37 UTC

Comment 16 thorsten.martens 2007-06-27 13:36:04 UTC

checked and verified in cws fwk66 -> OK !

Comment 17 thorsten.martens 2009-04-23 14:23:00 UTC

closed