Issue 71055

Summary: tab fill in text box have wrong appearance
Product: Draw Reporter: Joe Smith <jes>
Component: uiAssignee: christian.guenther
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE QA Contact: issues@graphics <issues>
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P3 CC: issues, pescetti
Version: OOo 2.0.4Keywords: regression
Target Milestone: OOo 2.2   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux, all   
Issue Type: DEFECT Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---
Description Flags
Document with screenshots demonstrating problem none

Description Joe Smith 2006-10-31 23:11:35 UTC
Text paragraphs in text box objects may have tab stops and fill styles set. The
appearance of the tab fill has changed between OOo 2.0.2 and 2.0.4, so that the
fill characters no longer fill the tab space. So, rather than this:


You see this:

  Left.     .      .Right

This happens for all the tab fill styles.

It happens for text boxes in Writer as well.

Steps to reproduce:
1) File > New > Drawing
2) Create a text box ("T" toolbar icon)
3) Enter text: A<tab>B<tab>C
4) Format > Paragraph
5) Create two tab stops (e.g. 2cm, 5cm)
6) Change the tab fill style for both tabs to ".........."
7) OK

Note that only three dots are used for each tab stop.
Comment 1 Joe Smith 2006-10-31 23:13:38 UTC
Created attachment 40202 [details]
Document with screenshots demonstrating problem
Comment 2 wolframgarten 2006-11-01 07:33:31 UTC
Comment 3 christian.guenther 2006-11-01 17:41:06 UTC
Set to new and change the target
Comment 4 christian.guenther 2006-11-01 17:44:20 UTC
I can reproduce the bug.
was ok in src680m173 and is broken in src680m178
Please have a look.
Comment 5 flaime 2006-11-03 14:05:32 UTC
The regression is related also to windows not only linux.
Comment 6 Joe Smith 2006-11-30 19:30:30 UTC
Based on my (unofficial) testing, this issue appears to be fixed in 2.1.0rc1
Comment 7 clippka 2006-12-01 10:13:05 UTC
I can also confirm that this seems to be fixed in m194

cl->cgu: please officially confirm and close
Comment 8 christian.guenther 2006-12-01 16:45:35 UTC
I can also reproduce that it works correct in the 195.
I close the issue as invalid.
Comment 9 christian.guenther 2006-12-01 16:46:37 UTC
I close the issue as invalid.
Comment 10 Joe Smith 2006-12-01 17:03:47 UTC

The issue was confirmed for 2.0.3/4--was nothing done to fix it?

I hope it didn't just mysteriously appear and disappear.