Issue 74296

Summary:	distribution of hyph_es_ES.dic violates the LPPL
Product:	lingucomponent	Reporter:	doko <doko>
Component:	other	Assignee:	issues@lingucomponent <issues>
Status:	CLOSED FIXED	QA Contact:	issues@lingucomponent <issues>
Severity:	Trivial
Priority:	P3	CC:	issues, mechtilde
Version:	OOo 2.2	Keywords:	oooqa
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Issue Type:	DEFECT	Latest Confirmation in:	---
Developer Difficulty:	---
Issue Depends on:
Issue Blocks:	74283

Description doko 2007-02-07 17:18:40 UTC

hyph_es_ES.dic, as found in
http://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/dictionaries/hyph_es_ES.zip

is derived from a file licensed under the LPPL, but it violates at least
paragraph 6d of the LPPL.

Needed information: Either distribute the original file as well, or (better)
name the file and the version of the file which the derived work is based on.
The LPPL requests "Information that is sufficient to obtain a complete,
unmodified copy of the Work."

The LPPL can be found at http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt

Comment 1 doko 2007-02-07 17:31:40 UTC

it is possible that the file is not derived from an LPPL'd file at all. we
should mention that in this bug report.

Comment 2 stefan.baltzer 2008-10-30 11:38:32 UTC

SBA: Confirming 21 sub-issues of issue 74283 at once.
I believe that doko did the right thing and could/should have set the issues to
NEW right after submitting (Just like all "CanConfirm rights owners" do when
submitting issues)

Thus I beieve that taking a second look at EACH of these files is not worth the
effort. The state "Unconfirmed" is irritating queries used in daily QA work.

Comment 3 Mechtilde 2009-12-19 21:16:52 UTC

no hyphenation in OOO320_m8

Comment 4 Pedro Giffuni 2011-12-02 05:01:07 UTC

The dictionary component was removed as part of the IP clearance process.