Issue 75649

Summary: show formula object on cell in legend
Product: General Reporter: muxecoid <muxecoid>
Component: chartAssignee: AOO issues mailing list <issues>
Status: CONFIRMED --- QA Contact:
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P5 (lowest) CC: issues, tony.galmiche.ooo
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: FEATURE Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---
Attachments:
Description Flags
Testcase none

Description muxecoid 2007-03-22 14:00:11 UTC
I put formula in the first row, but it is not shown in chart's legend. Testcase
attached.
Comment 1 muxecoid 2007-03-22 14:01:04 UTC
Created attachment 43861 [details]
Testcase
Comment 2 kla 2007-03-23 14:16:59 UTC
@IHA: Maybe a nice Idea to generate from an OLE-Object (e.g. Math) a Name for a
Datarow. I support this feature.
@ muxecoid: Thx for supporting OOo. Realy nice idea.
Comment 3 IngridvdM 2007-03-23 15:32:17 UTC
I see no way to realize this meaningful. Björn, what do you think, as you are on
the data interface and legend?
Comment 4 bjoern.milcke 2007-03-23 16:03:00 UTC
I could think of having some kind of TeX-like formula string or a MathML format
string that can nicely be rendered by the chart.

But OLE objects in general as names of legends? Phew, that sounds crazy. Do you
really want to allow another chart as a name for a dataseries? Or a presentation
document or a writer document taking a whole sheet of paper in space? The idea
of a series name is an identifier. Usually a string is sufficient for this. Of
course in some situations it makes sense to have more possibilities like just
x^2 with a superscript 2. We can think about this, but surely not to use OLE
objects as a name.

Btw. there is an issue for supporting subscript and superscript in titles (Issue
6521). That would also suffice for your example.
Comment 5 muxecoid 2007-03-25 06:52:02 UTC
#6521 is related. In some cases just sub and sup is enough, but complete
formulas  in charts support would be nice to have. I do not think that this bug
is duplicate, but solving it will solve #6521 as well.

Thank you.
Comment 6 tony.galmiche.ooo 2007-05-26 14:11:25 UTC
Duplicate issue 64825 ?
Comment 7 bjoern.milcke 2007-07-30 16:51:28 UTC
->tonygalmiche: No, not duplicate. That's a different thing.
Comment 8 IngridvdM 2008-07-03 11:39:09 UTC
change owner