Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing
|Summary:||WW8: The location of indexs and tables are wrong when open the document contain the indexs and tables by MS office.|
|Component:||code||Assignee:||AOO issues mailing list <issues>|
|Status:||CONFIRMED ---||QA Contact:|
|Priority:||P3||CC:||chengxiuzhi, issues, Mathias_Bauer, pagalmes.lists, peter.junge|
|Issue Type:||DEFECT||Latest Confirmation in:||---|
|Issue Depends on:|
Description liujiaxiang 2007-06-01 08:27:26 UTC
The location of indexs and tables are wrong when open the document contain the indexs and tables by MS office. 1. Create a new word-processing document and insert a table; 2. locate the cursor in the next paragraph of the table but no space; 3. Input some words and select some words from the front of the paragraph; 4. Insert -> indexs and tables -> entry -> select a random one -> insert -> close; 5. save as a .doc file. then open it; The location of indexs and tables are wrong.
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2007-06-01 13:20:14 UTC
MRU->liutao: could you please attach a sample document, so that we can better see what's going wrong here? Thanks a lot, this help QA & Development better understanding the Patch & Fix.
Comment 3 liujiaxiang 2007-06-06 09:13:58 UTC
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2007-06-06 17:16:19 UTC
MRU->liutao: please attach a native odt file which can show the problem to this issue. I do not understand the second step which says "locate the cursor in the next paragraph of the table but no space".
Comment 5 michael.ruess 2007-06-12 11:50:29 UTC
MRU->HBRINKM: I do not fully understand the error description nor a sample is attached. Could you please have a look at the patch proposal if this could be useful to your WW8 code? Thanks a lot!
Comment 6 openoffice 2007-07-02 14:08:32 UTC
Applied patch and failed building (on CWS swqbf99, based on SRC680.m217): .../swqbf99/SRC680/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx:1325: error: `sTxt' undeclared (first use this function) Please review the patch.
Comment 7 openoffice 2007-07-20 09:52:03 UTC
Comment 8 openoffice 2007-07-30 10:41:09 UTC
Comment 9 Mathias_Bauer 2007-08-20 08:44:31 UTC
Any news on that?
Comment 10 Mathias_Bauer 2007-10-09 11:42:29 UTC
Any news on that? Are you still working on the patch or should we abandon it?
Comment 11 liujiaxiang 2007-10-10 09:46:31 UTC
I suggest that we should abandon it.
Comment 12 Mathias_Bauer 2007-10-10 09:55:45 UTC
OK, thank you for letting me know. So back to "DEFECT".
Comment 13 pagalmes.lists 2008-02-20 09:41:35 UTC
shoulnd't that be set as a PATCH issue type?
Comment 14 Mathias_Bauer 2008-02-20 10:19:14 UTC
No, as you can read in the last comments, the patch didn't work and has been abandoned.