Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | Export to PDF for symbol glyphs in PDF-builtin fonts (i.e. EURO symbol) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | gsl | Reporter: | cosimomen <cosimomen> | ||||||
Component: | code | Assignee: | stefan.baltzer | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | issues@gsl <issues> | ||||||
Severity: | Trivial | ||||||||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | h.ilter, hdu, issues | ||||||
Version: | OOo 2.3 | Keywords: | regression | ||||||
Target Milestone: | OOo 2.3.1 | ||||||||
Hardware: | PC | ||||||||
OS: | All | ||||||||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||||
Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||||||||
Issue Depends on: | 74609 | ||||||||
Issue Blocks: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
cosimomen
2007-09-26 15:45:59 UTC
Created attachment 48517 [details]
pdf file saved from odt document with € symbol uncorrect
Created attachment 48518 [details]
odt file with € symbol correct
@HDU: please have a look. Windows only. I can reproduce it on unxlngi6 too. A quick workaround for users is to use the corresponding truetype font (e.g. TimesNewRoman instead of Times). @PL: in builds <=SRC680_m200 the Euro symbol gets encoded as 80 (WinAnsiEncoding) in the PDF, in builds >=SRC680_m220 the Euro symbol gets encoded as AC (WinAnsiEncoding) in the PDF. Unfortunately this code AC is already taken by "logicalnot". I suspect this regression was introduced by the big PDF-export changes in SRC680_m208 for the fix for issue 74609. By the way, the encoding AC for the Euro sign looks suspiciously like a lower bits of the unicode U+20AC (euro-currency-sign). Fixed in CWS vcl83. The regression seems to be introduced by vcl/source/gdi/pdfwriter_impl.cxx:1.102.66.1 @pl: please verify @hi: is this regression worthy of a target 2.3.1? @pl: please check, let HI verify adjusting the issue summary to the root cause Hi: I followed your instructions and the problem is solved if using Times New Roman instead of Times. Though in Oo 2.2 this problem did not existed...! Thanks @cosimomen: thanks for the feedback. Please don't change the issue status from FIXED to REOPENED,
unless you checked that the fix doesn't work.
> Though in Oo 2.2 this problem did not existed...!
That would explain why I mentioned "regression" in the issue's summary, keywords and some
comments ;-)
*** Issue 82540 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** also commited the fix to CWS with matching target @sba: please verify in CWS pdffix01 SBA->HDU: PLease fix for OOo 2.3.1 as agreed on in OOo releases IRC meeting today. *** Issue 76458 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** Verified with cws pdffix01 = ok See also i76458 SBA: OK in OOG680_m8. Closed. |