|
Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
| Summary: | display MWS name in about dialog | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | General | Reporter: | Frank Schönheit <frank.schoenheit> | ||||
| Component: | code | Assignee: | thorsten.martens | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | issues@framework <issues> | ||||
| Severity: | Trivial | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | issues | ||||
| Version: | DEV300m3 | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | OOo 3.0 | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||||||
| Issue Type: | PATCH | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||
| Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Created attachment 53404 [details]
patch
OF: Can we do this with issue 76868? fs->pb: Would it make sense to integrate this patch (provided it survives your review) together with your fix for issue 76868? pb: accepted for 3.0. pb: fixed in cws fwk88. Files changed: /unotools/inc/unotools/bootstrap.hxx 1.13.8.1 /unotools/source/config/bootstrap.cxx 1.25.6.1 /sfx2/source/appl/appserv.cxx 1.75.20.2 pb -> tm: please verify. Thx. Checked and verified in cws fwk88 -> OK ! This issue is closed automatically and wasn't rechecked in a current version of OOo. The fixed issue should be integrated in OOo since more than half a year. If you think this issue isn't fixed in a current version (OOo 3.1), please reopen it and change the field 'Target Milestone' accordingly. If you want to download a current version of OOo => http://download.openoffice.org/index.html If you want to know more about the handling of fixed/verified issues => http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Handle_fixed_verified_issues |
The about dialog ("Help / About") already features displaying the build id of OOo, by reading the "buildid" property from the .versionrc/version.ini file. However, this property misses an information which I consider important: The MWS of the build. That is, a OOo 2.2 displays "680m14(Build:9134)", a 2.3 displays "680m5(Build:9221)", a 2.4 displays "680m12(Build:9286)". In all cases, the UPD (680) is shown, but the MWS name (OOF680, OOG680, OOH680) is completely missing. I would consider it useful to display this information, too. The attached patch implements this.