Issue 90703

Summary: GAMMADIST, CHIDIST, GAMMAINV and CHIINV functions' accuracy
Product: Calc Reporter: ooo
Component: programmingAssignee: oc
Status: CLOSED FIXED QA Contact: issues@sc <issues>
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P3 CC: issues, rb.henschel
Version: recent-trunk   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Issue Type: PATCH Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---
Issue Depends on:    
Issue Blocks: 18704, 28815, 86294, 89691    
Description Flags
A few corner test cases; there's also much improvement in BETAINV, FINV and TINV none

Description ooo 2008-06-13 16:49:10 UTC
Functions deliver inaccurate results, better implementation received by mail.
Comment 1 ooo 2008-06-18 17:01:23 UTC
In cws odff04:


See also issues this issue blocks. A test case document for CHIDIST is attached
to issue 86294,
Implementation of GAMMADIST, CHIDIST, GAMMAINV and CHIINV functions is tightly
coupled based on GAMMA values.
Comment 2 ooo 2008-06-18 17:12:24 UTC
Created attachment 54575 [details]
A few corner test cases; there's also much improvement in BETAINV, FINV and TINV
Comment 3 ooo 2008-06-25 19:00:19 UTC
Reassigning to QA for verification.
Comment 4 ooo 2008-06-25 19:01:38 UTC
Comment 5 oc 2008-07-01 10:48:00 UTC
verified in internal build cws_odff04
Comment 6 thorsten.ziehm 2009-07-20 15:56:32 UTC
This issue is closed automatically and wasn't rechecked in a current version of
OOo. The fixed issue should be integrated in OOo since more than half a year. If
you think this issue isn't fixed in a current version (OOo 3.1), please reopen
it and change the field 'Target Milestone' accordingly.

If you want to download a current version of OOo =>
If you want to know more about the handling of fixed/verified issues =>