Issue 103465 - Replaced 1st by 1^st has not been translated in portuguese
Summary: Replaced 1st by 1^st has not been translated in portuguese
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: lingucomponent
Classification: Code
Component: other (show other issues)
Version: OOo 3.1
Hardware: Unknown All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 20348
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-07-11 04:07 UTC by gbpacheco
Modified: 2013-02-07 22:32 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Portuguese specification (draft, in portuguese) (26.80 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2009-11-18 17:47 UTC, gbpacheco 		no flags Details
Final specification of the AutoCorrect replacements of ordinal numbers in Portuguese (12.16 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2010-02-13 02:43 UTC, gbpacheco 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description gbpacheco 2009-07-11 04:07:27 UTC 
Hi! 

The function "Replace 1st... with 1^st..." in Tools/AutoCorrect/Options has not
been translated to portuguese. In brazilian version of OpenOffice.org, the
correct rule is replace 

 to male genre:
 - 1o with 1º
 - 2o with 2º 
 - 3º with 3º 
 - etc...

 to female genre:
 - 1a with 1ª
 - 2a with 2ª 
 - 3a with 3ª  
 - etc... 

 This options don´t run in brazilian portuguese OpenOffice.org. However, if I
write in 1st and 2nd (english), it´s ok to 1^st and 2^nd!

 I read the document
http://specs.openoffice.org/g11n/ordinal_numbers/ordinal_numbers.sxw and the
document don´t have the "Localized strings and algorithm for portuguese". 

 The rules is above but, if you need more information, please contact me!

 Thanks!

 Thanks!
 Gustavo Pacheco
Comment 1 auberon 2009-07-11 08:37:29 UTC 
This is a duplicate of this issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103465
Comment 2 auberon 2009-07-11 08:38:16 UTC 
Sorry, a duplicate of this issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20348
Comment 3 eric.savary 2009-09-25 15:00:53 UTC 
Hi Gustavo!

We are working on the implementation of issue 20348.
Good that I have found your issue now!

Please e-mail me the detailed cases in the form I wrote them in
http://specs.openoffice.org/g11n/ordinal_numbers/ordinal_numbers.sxw
-> Rules, Exceptions, particularity.

Please also check if there are differences between pt_BR and pt_PT... and other
pt_* loacales.

Muito obrigado!
Comment 4 eric.savary 2009-09-25 15:03:34 UTC 
Setting "depends on" instead of closing "duplicate"
Comment 5 eric.savary 2009-10-05 13:56:10 UTC 
Added the spec as Wiki page:

http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Localized_AutoCorrection_of_Ordinal_Numbers_(1st_2nd)
Comment 6 gbpacheco 2009-11-18 17:47:58 UTC 
Created attachment 66176 [details]
Portuguese specification (draft, in portuguese)
Comment 7 gbpacheco 2010-02-13 02:43:26 UTC 
Created attachment 67801 [details]
Final specification of the AutoCorrect replacements of ordinal numbers in Portuguese