Issue 104461 - [QUASTE] QA-Rep should be able to overwrite test results of an other tester running only test case
Summary: [QUASTE] QA-Rep should be able to overwrite test results of an other tester r...
Status: REOPENED
Alias: None
Product: Build Tools
Classification: Code
Component: www (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.0
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-24 14:35 UTC by eric.savary
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:34 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description eric.savary 2009-08-24 14:35:29 UTC
- Provided a tester A (typically a qabot) runs an automated test on a machine A.
- 1 test case shows 1 error in the whole automated test.
- Tester B (who is QA-Rep) will run on machine B this  test case.
-> The result from tester B won't be written to QUASTE.

The tester B must re-run the the whole automated test (which might take several
hours!) only to run a 10 sec test...

SHOULD: a QA-Rep should be allowed to overwrite errors and warnings from
existing test results which he didn't run without having to re-run the whole
automated test
Comment 1 helge.delfs 2009-10-19 07:29:06 UTC
Target changed
Comment 2 bernd.eilers 2009-10-19 10:19:48 UTC
Adding myself to CC. I also think it's a design error that test results can not
be overwritten by a second test of a second user. 

Comment 3 helge.delfs 2009-11-13 10:43:06 UTC
Now QA-Rep and CWS-Owner are able to update previous testruns with no
consideration of where those results came from initially
Comment 4 helge.delfs 2009-11-13 10:44:19 UTC
hde->es: Please verify on internal QUASTe. I will then deploy changes to
quaste.services.openoffice.org
Comment 5 eric.savary 2009-11-13 10:49:56 UTC
As far as I can see, works now like a charm! :)
Comment 6 eric.savary 2009-11-13 10:50:11 UTC
Closed
Comment 7 bernd.eilers 2009-11-13 10:57:44 UTC
reopening issue because I consider this fixed but failed according to the
description on how it was fixed.

Why limiting this to the QA Rep and the CWS Owner. There could be for example 3
Tester working on the CWS with the one doing the automated test for the second
time not necessarily being the owner or the QA Rep. A later test result should
always overwrite a previous test result no matter who ever executed the later one. 
Comment 8 eric.savary 2009-11-13 11:01:52 UTC
@Bei: I was also advocating for "total overwriting freedom" but HDE (somehow ;)
) convinced me that "there are cases" where this is not what we want...

I let him explain... ;)