Issue 104631 - [cws printerpullpages] Missing "default" in "Slides per page" for Handouts
Summary: [cws printerpullpages] Missing "default" in "Slides per page" for Handouts
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 94055
Alias: None
Product: Impress
Classification: Application
Component: printing (show other issues)
Version: DEV300m55
Hardware: PC All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 3.3
Assignee: clippka
QA Contact: issues@graphics
Depends on:
Reported: 2009-08-30 17:45 UTC by Regina Henschel
Modified: 2009-11-01 08:22 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

presentation with custom handouts (26.88 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.presentation)
2009-08-30 17:46 UTC, Regina Henschel
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Regina Henschel 2009-08-30 17:45:31 UTC
Open a presentation which has a custom designed handout, for example 1 column, 4
rows with slides on the left and a 4 rectangles with line hatching on the right
in landscape.
File > Print.
On tab 'General' section 'Print' select 'Handouts' in drop-down list 'Document'.
Open drop-down list 'Slides per page'.
There are only items 1,2,3,4,6,9. The item 'default' is missing.

This item can be seen in

The setting 'default' is meant to print the handout in exact that layout, which
the user has created on the 'Handout' tab in Impress. I'll attach such a
presentation (missing pictures are in the zip-file of issue104516).

The item 'default' is needed to fix issue 94055.
Comment 1 Regina Henschel 2009-08-30 17:46:33 UTC
Created attachment 64441 [details]
presentation with custom handouts
Comment 2 christoph 2009-08-30 19:50:00 UTC
@Regina: CL informed me in a mail to some I-Team members (2009-08-25) that this
feature will be earliest available in OOo 3.3 (or even later).
Comment 3 wolframgarten 2009-08-31 08:06:24 UTC
Comment 4 clippka 2009-10-22 11:18:56 UTC
Comment 5 clippka 2009-10-22 13:14:41 UTC
I noticed that there already is an older issue also including votes (thanks
cornouws), so I close this one as duplicate and fix it using issue 94055 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 94055 ***
Comment 6 clippka 2009-10-22 13:17:12 UTC
Comment 7 Mechtilde 2009-11-01 08:22:14 UTC
duplicate -> closed