Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 109968
[api] undocumented cursor properties
Last modified: 2013-02-24 21:06:27 UTC
writer implements a bunch of properties on its text cursor that are not documented in the API reference. for example: unomap.cxx:144: { SW_PROP_NMID(UNO_NAME_DOCUMENT_INDEX), FN_UNO_DOCUMENT_INDEX, CPPU_E2T(CPPUTYPE_REFDOCINDEX), PropertyAttribute::MAYBEVOID|PropertyAttribute::READONLY ,0 }, \ { SW_PROP_NMID(UNO_NAME_TEXT_TABLE), FN_UNO_TEXT_TABLE, CPPU_E2T(CPPUTYPE_REFTXTTABLE), PropertyAttribute::MAYBEVOID|PropertyAttribute::READONLY ,0 }, \ { SW_PROP_NMID(UNO_NAME_CELL), FN_UNO_CELL, CPPU_E2T(CPPUTYPE_REFCELL), PropertyAttribute::MAYBEVOID|PropertyAttribute::READONLY ,0 }, \ { SW_PROP_NMID(UNO_NAME_TEXT_FRAME), FN_UNO_TEXT_FRAME, CPPU_E2T(CPPUTYPE_REFTEXTFRAME), PropertyAttribute::MAYBEVOID|PropertyAttribute::READONLY ,0 }, \ { SW_PROP_NMID(UNO_NAME_TEXT_SECTION), FN_UNO_TEXT_SECTION, CPPU_E2T(CPPUTYPE_REFTEXTSECTION), PropertyAttribute::MAYBEVOID|PropertyAttribute::READONLY ,0 }, \ unomap.cxx:279: { SW_PROP_NMID(UNO_NAME_DOCUMENT_INDEX_MARK), FN_UNO_DOCUMENT_INDEX_MARK, CPPU_E2T(CPPUTYPE_REFDOCIDXMRK), PropertyAttribute::MAYBEVOID|PropertyAttribute::READONLY ,0 },\ { SW_PROP_NMID(UNO_NAME_TEXT_FIELD), FN_UNO_TEXT_FIELD, CPPU_E2T(CPPUTYPE_REFTXTFIELD), PropertyAttribute::MAYBEVOID|PropertyAttribute::READONLY ,0 },\ { SW_PROP_NMID(UNO_NAME_REFERENCE_MARK), FN_UNO_REFERENCE_MARK, CPPU_E2T(CPPUTYPE_REFTEXTCNTNT), PropertyAttribute::MAYBEVOID ,0 },\ { SW_PROP_NMID(UNO_NAME_FOOTNOTE), FN_UNO_FOOTNOTE, CPPU_E2T(CPPUTYPE_REFFOOTNOTE), PropertyAttribute::MAYBEVOID|PropertyAttribute::READONLY ,0 },\ { SW_PROP_NMID(UNO_NAME_ENDNOTE), FN_UNO_ENDNOTE, CPPU_E2T(CPPUTYPE_REFFOOTNOTE), PropertyAttribute::MAYBEVOID|PropertyAttribute::READONLY ,0 },\
created a new service css.text.TextRangeContentProperties.idl. fixed in cws odfmetadata4: http://hg.services.openoffice.org/hg/cws/odfmetadata4/rev/246fbbe011aa
please verify
verified Is it possible to provide a little bit more documentation in the service description. The current one line documentation is obsolete because it provides nothing more info as the type and name of property. I know we often have documented IDL types this way but we can improve it. And if possible we should extend the DevGuide and provide an exmaple ...
closed, verified on master