Issue 110840 - WW8: in certain case TOC not evaluated up to correct level
Summary: WW8: in certain case TOC not evaluated up to correct level
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: open-import (show other issues)
Version: OOO320m12
Hardware: PC All
: P4 Trivial with 2 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords: regression
: 115319 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-04-13 12:51 UTC by black666
Modified: 2017-05-20 11:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Document without any confidential data (54.50 KB, application/msword)
2010-04-21 13:32 UTC, michael.ruess 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description black666 2010-04-13 12:51:33 UTC 
Up until today I used OO 2.4.1 on Ubuntu.Today I upgraded to the latest OO 3.2
and now the TOC in .doc files doesn't look the same anymore.

The original file has 3 heading levels in the TOC, but OO only shows 2. I
checked with a WordViewer under WindowsXP and OO 2.4.1 on Ubuntu and they all
show the correct amount of levels (3) in the TOC.

When I edit the TOC in OO 3.2 it even shows a setting of "2" for heading levels.
If I set it to 3, the TOC looks like expected, but once I reopen the file, the
doc-import again sets it to 2. (I could save the file, but that's not the point)
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2010-04-16 08:37:45 UTC 
I am not able to reproduce the problem from the scratch with my test documents,
please attach a  document which shows the problem to this issue, so that we can
reproduce and fix the problem here. You can also send the document directly
(mru@openoffice.org) for the case it contains confidential data.
Maybe this is the same problem as issue 83492.
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2010-04-19 10:49:13 UTC 
Not reproducible without sample file. Feel free to reopen issue when it can be
provided.
Comment 3 michael.ruess 2010-04-19 10:49:33 UTC 
Closed.
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2010-04-21 13:23:15 UTC 
Reopening issue as this is now reproducible with a document.
Comment 5 michael.ruess 2010-04-21 13:27:48 UTC 
MRU->HBRINKM: I have now replicated the problem with a document based on the
confidential document sent by the submitter. Open the attached doc and see that
the TOC will only be evaluated up to level 2 instead of level 3. This worked
fine until OOo 3.1.1 and broke in 3.2.
Comment 6 michael.ruess 2010-04-21 13:32:20 UTC 
Created attachment 69023 [details]
Document without any confidential data
Comment 7 eric.savary 2010-11-01 08:54:24 UTC 
*** Issue 115319 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 8 Mathias_Bauer 2011-02-17 15:17:55 UTC 
According to our new regression issue handling for the 3.4 relrease the field
priority is now used as the order we want to work on them, no longer as a
"severity". The high number of regressions in the WW8 filters makes it necessary
to prioritize them as we won't be able to fix all of them for 3.4. We decided to
first focus on the export. Thus most regressions in the import filter now get
priority "P4", what means that they will be reevaluated in the next release cycle.
Comment 9 Marcus 2017-05-20 11:19:35 UTC 
Reset assigne to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org".