Issue 112598 - really slow graphics in Impress module
Summary: really slow graphics in Impress module
Status: CLOSED IRREPRODUCIBLE
Alias: None
Product: Impress
Classification: Application
Component: editing (show other issues)
Version: OOO320m9
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Armin Le Grand
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL: http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/Re...
Keywords: needmoreinfo
: 110309 110976 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-06-22 12:06 UTC by karstenburger
Modified: 2010-06-23 09:46 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
little example presentation (12.67 KB, text/plain)
2010-06-22 12:08 UTC, karstenburger
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description karstenburger 2010-06-22 12:06:49 UTC
I was in the middle of editing a presentation, when I decided to upgrade from 
v2.0 to 3.2.1.
  
I found it really annoying, how slow the new program version is. Also I saw a 
really high CPU load, although my computer is not old (3 years Intel Core Duo 
with Suse Linux 10.2 installed). 
On older computers it will be unusable.

See attached a little presentation.

Select second page (with almost no text). 
Click on text somwhere to select text box.
"Take" text box window frame and try to move it a bit.
--> this takes several seconds now until the window is updated again, but was 
very quick in OO v2.0.
Comment 1 karstenburger 2010-06-22 12:08:34 UTC
Created attachment 70144 [details]
little example presentation
Comment 2 karstenburger 2010-06-22 12:09:06 UTC
see attached simple presentation
Comment 3 wolframgarten 2010-06-22 13:25:24 UTC
3.2.1 is a OOO320_m18.  Please have a try to dedactivate hardware acceleration
or anti aliasing in tools/options/OpenOffice/view/Graphic output. Is this an
original OOo version or from some other distributor? Thanks.
Comment 4 karstenburger 2010-06-22 14:14:20 UTC
When I switched off anti aliasing in tools/options/OpenOffice/view/Graphic
output  (German version:
Extras/Optionen/OpenOffice.org/Ansicht/Graphikausgabe/"Antialiasing benutzen"),
the problem was solved.
The option "hardware acceleration" at the same location was correctly
greyed/deactivated.

This was an original version, not from a distributor.
Comment 5 wolframgarten 2010-06-22 14:46:30 UTC
Reassigned. Any clues on this?
Comment 6 karstenburger 2010-06-22 15:26:16 UTC
Openoffice could detect, whether direct rendering is available and/or CPU is
quick, and deactivate anti-aliasing otherwise.
Comment 7 Armin Le Grand 2010-06-22 16:57:38 UTC
AW->karstenburger: Thanks for the mail, but this is known. AntiAliasing comes
with some cost, that's why it can be switched off. You still have all the
goodies of the new version when switching AA off. Problem is that AA needs kinda
HW-support, and when You say it's slow on Your system and the HW-flag is greyed
out, please switch off AA. It's a nice idea to do that automatically, but as You
surely know OOo runs on all kinds of OSes and HWs, sothis functionality is
simply not there. We already do our best; on Linux e.g. the availability of
XRender is checked and if not there, AA is already switched off automatically.
Doing more will bring all people up on the mailing lists which complain that AA
is 'brokenÄ on their machines.
XRender and HW-support is available now for most machines/OSes, thus the default
is okay. We know it can get slow on other systems, that's why we kept the
'switch AA off' option at all.
We are also speeding up graphics processing where we can; e.g in CWS vcl111 is a
new trapezoid decomposer which is needed to paint anything on XRender AAed at
all. This will speedup things, too, but not on OOo 3.2.1 codeline, but on 3.3.

HTH!
Comment 8 karstenburger 2010-06-22 17:03:47 UTC
Thank you very much, this is ok for me.
Comment 9 Armin Le Grand 2010-06-22 17:22:41 UTC
AW: Okay, closing.
Comment 10 wolframgarten 2010-06-23 09:14:58 UTC
*** Issue 110309 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 11 wolframgarten 2010-06-23 09:46:24 UTC
*** Issue 110976 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***