Issue 112666 - chart2/qa/unoapi sch.ChXChartDocument, sch.ChXDiagram failures
Summary: chart2/qa/unoapi sch.ChXChartDocument, sch.ChXDiagram failures
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: chart (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: oc
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL:
Keywords: regression
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-06-24 16:38 UTC by Stephan Bergmann
Modified: 2017-05-20 11:42 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
test log (199.19 KB, text/plain)
2010-06-24 16:40 UTC, Stephan Bergmann 		no flags Details
patch to fix the issue (1.66 KB, text/plain)
2010-06-28 15:08 UTC, IngridvdM 		no flags Details
macro to reproduce the problem (16.67 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet)
2010-06-28 15:57 UTC, IngridvdM 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Stephan Bergmann 2010-06-24 16:38:36 UTC 
<http://termite.services.openoffice.org/buildbot/builders/Ubuntu-9.04-i386/builds/2441>
on CWS sb127, effectively being latest re/DEV300_next towards DEV300_m84 with
subsequenttests enabled, fails in chart2/qa/unoapi with the attached
Ubuntu-9.04-i386.subsequenttests.log.
Comment 1 Stephan Bergmann 2010-06-24 16:40:01 UTC 
Created attachment 70203 [details]
test log
Comment 2 Stephan Bergmann 2010-06-24 16:43:21 UTC 
(same for
<http://termite.services.openoffice.org/buildbot/builders/Solaris-Sparc/builds/2202>,
so this appears to not be a sporadic-only problem)
Comment 3 IngridvdM 2010-06-28 15:08:02 UTC 
Created attachment 70263 [details]
patch to fix the issue
Comment 4 IngridvdM 2010-06-28 15:46:51 UTC 
Two problems were found:
New properties were introduced with wrong flags causing the now more strict
XPropertySet test to break. Those flags are corrected with the patch.
The second problem is more severe as I thought first. The method setPosition
does not fail because the new position is really out of range. A new bug was
introduced that makes it impossible to use this method.
Both are regressions and both could have been prevented if the tests have been
enabled before, sigh.
I will create a new patch, fixing the second problem correctly.
Comment 5 IngridvdM 2010-06-28 15:57:43 UTC 
Created attachment 70266 [details]
macro to reproduce the problem
Comment 6 IngridvdM 2010-07-02 15:25:08 UTC 
Fixed in CWS calc56 with this patch:
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/calc56/rev/590a28982c39
Comment 7 IngridvdM 2010-07-19 15:47:59 UTC 
@oc, please verify with the attached Macro-Document in CWS calc56.
Comment 8 oc 2010-07-26 08:20:57 UTC 
verified in internal build cws_calc56