Issue 12294 - DTD specifies HTML 3.2, but 4.0 element attributes are generated
Summary: DTD specifies HTML 3.2, but 4.0 element attributes are generated
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 19690
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.0
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: eric.savary
QA Contact: issues@sw
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Reported: 2003-03-13 03:32 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2003-09-24 08:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

DOC file used to generate errors (198.00 KB, application/msword)
2003-03-13 03:35 UTC, Unknown
no flags Details
v1.1b2 (235.06 KB, application/zip)
2003-06-21 19:08 UTC, Unknown
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-03-13 03:32:24 UTC
I'm attempting to save a large DOC file from a county commisioner meeting as
HTML.  The following HTML 4.0 element attributes and values were generated:

<BODY LANG="en-US" TEXT="#000000"> no style in 3.2 for this element
<P ALIGN=LEFT STYLE="font-weight: medium"> no style in 3.2 for this element
<FONT FACE="WP TypographicSymbols"> no face in 3.2 for this element
<P ALIGN=JUSTIFY> justify is not a valid value in 3.2
Comment 1 Unknown 2003-03-13 03:35:33 UTC
Created attachment 5073 [details]
DOC file used to generate errors
Comment 2 Unknown 2003-05-19 22:03:45 UTC
Still occurs in OOo v1.1b
Comment 3 Unknown 2003-06-21 19:08:52 UTC
Created attachment 7036 [details]
Comment 4 prgmgr 2003-06-26 19:09:35 UTC
Rick, thank you for using and supporting OOo.

1.1 Beta 2 puts the line

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

for me.

Does the problem still exist for you in 1.1 Beta 2?
Comment 5 Unknown 2003-06-26 20:11:55 UTC
Go to Tools->Options->Load/Save and set Export to HTML 3.2.
Save the document.

As you can see from the attachment, the generated
3.2 file has the correct doctype, but the elements are not in the 3.2
DTD, as I specified in this issue.
Comment 6 mci 2003-09-11 11:58:15 UTC
reassigned to es
Comment 7 eric.savary 2003-09-22 17:44:35 UTC
Duplicate of the main issue 19690

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 19690 ***
Comment 8 eric.savary 2003-09-22 17:45:54 UTC
Comment 9 jogi 2003-09-24 08:55:10 UTC