Issue 123548 - AOO 4.0.1 does not work with OS X 10.9
Summary: AOO 4.0.1 does not work with OS X 10.9
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 121478
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 4.0.1
Hardware: Mac OS X 10.9
: P3 Critical (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-10-25 13:37 UTC by lee lester
Modified: 2017-05-20 10:01 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Screenshot showing same bug on a second machine [mine]. (280.24 KB, image/png)
2013-10-25 21:05 UTC, suned 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description lee lester 2013-10-25 13:37:51 UTC 
I downloaded and opened AOO 4.0.1. On installation I opted for the new version to replace the old. I now get this notice: 'OpenOffice can't be opened because  it is from an unidentified developer. Safari downloaded this file today at 8.49 AM from source forge.net.' 

This means I cannot get at essential documents, etc., formulated in OpenOffice.

I therefore hope for a solution ASAP. TIA.
Comment 1 suned 2013-10-25 21:05:16 UTC 
Created attachment 81820 [details]
Screenshot showing same bug on a second machine [mine].
Comment 2 Raphael Bircher 2013-10-29 08:33:48 UTC 
I quote from the release notes "Apache OpenOffice 4.0.0 will be flagged by the new Gatekeeper facility in Mac OS X Mountain Lion. This is a new feature to help guard against malware on Mac systems. There is a procedure laid out at the following link to allow applications not installed from the Mac App store to run. See the article at Mac support at http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5290."

Close issue
Comment 3 Rainer Bielefeld 2013-11-01 05:47:25 UTC 
*** Issue 123600 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 4 Rainer Bielefeld 2013-12-04 15:57:29 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 121478 ***