Issue 14211 - Heading numbering in conditional/hidden sections is still counted
Summary: Heading numbering in conditional/hidden sections is still counted
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 49960
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.0.3
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: jack.warchold
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-05-07 19:22 UTC by wayfarer3130
Modified: 2006-01-30 14:16 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description wayfarer3130 2003-05-07 19:22:57 UTC 
If you have a conditional section in your document, and it has headings in it
with the heading numbering turned on, then the next heading after the hidden
section will look like the hidden section wasn't hidden.

That is, if I have:

1. Heading A

Conditional Section 1
2. Heading B
End Section 1

3. Heading C

Heading C will always be 3., regardless of whether or not Section 1 is hidden. 
This seems counter-intuitive, as it means that it is hard to exclude sections
and then have the formatting work out correctly.
Comment 1 jack.warchold 2003-09-29 13:07:50 UTC 
please install the latest office release and try to reproduce this 
issue


reassigend to jw
Comment 2 jack.warchold 2003-10-13 13:36:44 UTC 
closed due the long time of inactivity
Comment 3 jack.warchold 2003-10-13 13:37:00 UTC 
wfm -> closed
Comment 4 ftack 2006-01-26 15:12:37 UTC 
Even if the OP did not reply, this is and remains an issue with hidden sections.
Headings continue to be counted wether the section is hidden or not. It is easy
enough to reproduce that. This issue should therefore be reopened and be acted
upon when time and resources permit.

See this recent thread on Ooo forum

http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?p=122408
Comment 5 jack.warchold 2006-01-30 14:14:53 UTC 
hello ftack

please take a look on the comment by mru in issue 49960.

set this issue here as duplicate of issue 49960 even if it is older.
Comment 6 jack.warchold 2006-01-30 14:15:49 UTC 
set duplicate

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 49960 ***
Comment 7 jack.warchold 2006-01-30 14:16:51 UTC 
duplicate -> closed