Issue 16211 - second level headings in page header
Summary: second level headings in page header
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 Beta
Hardware: PC All
: P3 Trivial with 14 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
: 41632 54312 56248 66965 87877 95739 101974 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-06-29 14:01 UTC by guido.pinkernell
Modified: 2017-05-20 10:45 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
File with incorrect header (12.21 KB, text/plain)
2008-12-09 20:58 UTC, tab 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description guido.pinkernell 2003-06-29 14:01:09 UTC 
1. Open new doc and write Heading 1 (line feed) Heading 2
2. Define "Heading 1" as paragraph style heading 1
3. Define "Heading 2" as paragraph style heading 2
4. In a Header, Insert : Field : Other : Chapter
5. Choose any format
6. Select Layer "2", then click "Insert"

"Heading 2" should appear, instead "Heading 1" appears.

Guido
Comment 1 con.hennessy 2003-07-07 21:39:31 UTC 
I see the same problem.
Comment 2 h.ilter 2003-07-08 11:41:59 UTC 
Reassigned to ES
Comment 3 eric.savary 2003-07-09 11:40:36 UTC 
ES->MMP: as discussed, this behaviour is in keeping with the current
concept (fields get the outline placed before them). But we should
change this behaviour which is IMHO wrong. Fields should display the
on the page *next* coming chapter.
Comment 4 matthias.mueller-prove 2003-07-09 15:15:34 UTC 
yes, I agree. We should fix it.
Comment 5 matthias.mueller-prove 2004-02-19 11:29:36 UTC 
Eric is working on the specification.
Comment 6 eric.savary 2004-05-19 13:13:56 UTC 
No resource to achieve this for OOo 2.0, to bad! :(
Retarget to OOo later.
added keyword "8,5" to dev notes

Specification can be found here
http://specs.openoffice.org/writer/numbering/running_heads_spec.sxw
Comment 7 eric.savary 2004-05-19 13:15:00 UTC 
.
Comment 8 eric.savary 2004-05-19 13:15:25 UTC 
.
Comment 9 eric.savary 2004-05-19 13:24:44 UTC 
.
Comment 10 eric.savary 2004-05-19 13:27:00 UTC 
ES->EM: SPec ready for string review.
Comment 11 eric.savary 2004-05-21 13:13:06 UTC 
.
Comment 12 eric.savary 2004-05-21 13:14:03 UTC 
Reassigned to liz
Comment 13 eric.savary 2004-06-15 13:35:17 UTC 
.
Comment 14 e.matthis 2004-06-17 16:49:16 UTC 
accepting, but won't start review till muuuuuch later.
Comment 15 eric.savary 2005-02-01 13:46:08 UTC 
*** Issue 41632 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 16 e.matthis 2005-07-26 09:40:52 UTC 
Working on string review today
Comment 17 e.matthis 2005-07-26 16:40:24 UTC 
string review done. Coming via mail. Returning issue to you for reassigning for
implementation because it is not a plain string review issue and I don't want it
to get lost/untracked
Comment 18 eric.savary 2005-09-13 13:27:17 UTC 
*** Issue 54312 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 19 eric.savary 2005-09-30 13:17:22 UTC 
ES->AMA: as discussed, please keep this task until we come to implement it.
Comment 20 eric.savary 2006-08-15 10:55:21 UTC 
*** Issue 66965 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 21 eric.savary 2006-08-16 13:19:22 UTC 
Corrected typo in summary.
Comment 22 eric.savary 2006-08-23 13:15:35 UTC 
*** Issue 56248 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 23 rbos 2007-02-22 10:56:03 UTC 
I hope you don't mind asking me the following:

what is the status of this issue?  It seems about to me finished, at least
that is what I conclude from the commands:


=======================
------- Additional comments from liz Tue Jul 26 15:40:24 +0000 2005 -------

string review done. Coming via mail. Returning issue to you for reassigning for
implementation because it is not a plain string review issue and I don't want it
to get lost/untracked

------- Additional comments from es Fri Sep 30 12:17:22 +0000 2005 -------

ES->AMA: as discussed, please keep this task until we come to implement it.
=======================


Last update concerning code seem around sep 2005.  Is there any possibility
to have this enhancement in OO.org-2.2 or 2.3?
Comment 24 mdxonefour 2007-08-21 11:11:07 UTC 
MD: added md to cc
Comment 25 eric.savary 2008-04-07 08:55:22 UTC 
@ AMA: can we include this to a Writer I-Team for 3.1?
More than a "new feature", it's a pretty old bug.
Comment 26 eric.savary 2008-04-07 08:55:42 UTC 
*** Issue 87877 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 27 Regina Henschel 2008-11-02 00:42:12 UTC 
*** Issue 95739 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 28 aviret 2008-12-02 08:31:06 UTC 
Is it possible to get info of when this issue could be solved ? Thanks in advance
Comment 29 tab 2008-12-09 20:58:35 UTC 
Created attachment 58663 [details]
File with incorrect header
Comment 30 eric.savary 2009-05-15 23:13:49 UTC 
*** Issue 101974 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 31 andreas.martens 2009-05-18 08:07:48 UTC 
ama->mba: An old interoperability issue (bug/feature) with an existing
specification.
Comment 32 Mathias_Bauer 2010-05-14 14:37:15 UTC 
please take over
Comment 33 Regina Henschel 2015-02-04 10:31:01 UTC 
Hi Oliver, this is still assigned to you. Is it really on your ToDo list?
Comment 34 Marcus 2017-05-20 10:45:26 UTC 
Reset the assignee to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org".