Issue 16700 - Form autopilot creates invisible date/time fields
Summary: Form autopilot creates invisible date/time fields
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 14868
Alias: None
Product: Base
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 RC3
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.0
Assignee: berend.cornelius
QA Contact: issues@dba
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-07-11 03:29 UTC by kelvine
Modified: 2006-05-31 14:29 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Screen image showing date/time field not aligned from autopilot (128.04 KB, image/png)
2003-07-11 03:32 UTC, kelvine
no flags Details
MS Access XP mdb file. Single table with two fields, one a date/time field (160.00 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-07-11 03:34 UTC, kelvine
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description kelvine 2003-07-11 03:29:19 UTC
Hi,

This problem existed before OO1.1RC so it is not new to the RC.

When creating a Form using the Autopilot based on a MS Access MDB file 
connected using ODBC date/time fields are not correctly layed out.

They are correct until the Create button is pressed.  Once the create button 
is pressed the date/time fields are redrawn out of alignment.

I've included a screen shot and a very simple mdb file for testing.

Hope it helps

Kelvin
Comment 1 kelvine 2003-07-11 03:32:29 UTC
Created attachment 7571 [details]
Screen image showing date/time field not aligned from autopilot
Comment 2 kelvine 2003-07-11 03:34:16 UTC
Created attachment 7572 [details]
MS Access XP mdb file. Single table with two fields, one a date/time field
Comment 3 marc.neumann 2003-07-11 09:23:22 UTC
set target and send to the right developer. The same problem occurr in
OOo 1.0
Comment 4 berend.cornelius 2003-08-19 16:49:41 UTC
BC: Duplicate to #4868#

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 4868 ***
Comment 5 kelvine 2003-08-20 02:35:59 UTC
Hi,

I think a mistake has been made here. 

This issue has nothing to do with issue 4868 so I am reopening the 
issue.

In fact I just checked with OO1.1RC3 and the date/time fields no 
longer appear at all.  

This is very bad as the Form Pilot is now close to useless for 
handling date/time fields.  

I am changing this to a priority 2 as it means a feature which 
previously worked (albeit badly) now works worse.



Kelvin

Comment 6 Frank Schönheit 2003-08-20 07:31:33 UTC
I can reproduce the invisibility of the fields in RC3. If you ungroup
the shape, then the two missing fields appear (but are still
improperly positioned).
I'm adjusting the summary accordingly.

fs->tz: Do you approve a 1.1.1 target for this?
Comment 7 berend.cornelius 2003-08-20 09:12:09 UTC
BC: Sorry: This bug is duplicate to 14868 (and not 4868)but it
definitely is!

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 14868 ***
Comment 8 Frank Schönheit 2003-08-20 16:41:38 UTC
for the records: the fact that both fields seem to not exist in RC3 is
probably the problem covered in issue 18447.
Comment 9 Frank Schönheit 2003-08-20 17:14:46 UTC
correction: not completely the same as issue 18447. 18447 is about
controls grouped with non-controls, which produces permanently
invisible controls.
This one is about a control (the label) which is grouped with another
group of two other controls (the edit fields for date and time). This
seems to persist until the document is reloaded.
Comment 10 kelvine 2003-08-21 02:18:10 UTC
Hi,

Should I reopen this issue since it is not an exact duplicate of 
14447.  Also 14868 is what this issue was about until RC3 came out. 
Then the problem changed and this is not mentioned in 14868.

IMHO it is better that all variations of a problem be logged and 
tested that they have been fixed, and then closed.

Having this issue closed may result in the problem/variation being 
missed.

Just wondering.

Kelvin
Comment 11 Frank Schönheit 2003-08-21 08:15:24 UTC
Kelvin, you're absolutely right with your concerns about potentially
missing variations of a problem. So normmally, I would agree that you
re-open the issue, until the responsible developer explicitly says
that it's a duplicate (which is an assumption only so far). In such a
case, the person verifying an fix (the developer, and/or the QA
engineer) has to also verify all duplicates.

But in this special case, please refrain from doing so. Oliver (OD)
already found the fix for bug 18447, and it also fixes the
invisibility of the datetime fields in this bug. So this aspect is
definately a duplicate of 18447, while the original bug is still a
duplicate of bug 14868.
Comment 12 hans_werner67 2004-02-02 12:38:11 UTC
change subcomponent to 'none'
Comment 13 Martin Hollmichel 2005-01-18 14:44:31 UTC
close issue.