Issue 19178 - Writer crash when using scanner
Summary: Writer crash when using scanner
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 18863
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 RC3
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: jack.warchold
QA Contact: issues@sw
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Reported: 2003-09-07 01:25 UTC by germusic
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:41 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description germusic 2003-09-07 01:25:27 UTC
When trying to import a partial scan (request)after succesfully setting up a scanner 
within openoffice (agfa spanscan e20) writer crashes. Unfortunaly it also crashes 
the scanner (stays busy forever with every other application i use)
Comment 1 jack.warchold 2003-09-08 16:29:50 UTC
if OOo craches please send the crashreport.

if you got a craschreport please post the id here

Comment 2 germusic 2003-09-08 22:43:56 UTC
I would like but i can't send a crash report :(. The scanner has become 
totally unreachable for any application. It seems that setting up the 
scanner with OpenOffice mucked up the firmware in the scanner. Now 
the scanner boots up just scanning a tiny area and reprting to 
applications that it is busy. 
Comment 3 alex.thurgood 2003-09-12 14:58:15 UTC
I can confirm that with a HPG85 scanner under MDK 9.1 Linux and OOo
1.1 RC1, the same behaviour occurs. This makes at least two different
scanners that provoke the same behaviour. It is not so much a crash as
a freeze. OOo lets me scan the document, but when it comes to copying
the image from memory into writer , the whole app freezes. OOo will
accept no further mouse or keyboard input. You need to kill it to free
up the app and the ressources.

I'm setting the oooqa tag and confirming.

Comment 4 jack.warchold 2003-09-15 12:27:11 UTC
set target to OOo2.0
Comment 5 jack.warchold 2003-09-15 16:27:01 UTC
set as duplicate

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 18863 ***
Comment 6 jack.warchold 2003-09-15 16:27:28 UTC
duplicate -> closed