Issue 20535 - frame does not expand section
Summary: frame does not expand section
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1 RC5
Hardware: PC All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-01 09:07 UTC by michael.ruess
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:38 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Document containing section and frame (10.08 KB, application/soffice)
2003-10-01 09:10 UTC, michael.ruess 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description michael.ruess 2003-10-01 09:07:20 UTC 
This is a follow up issue to issue 19853. 
Open attached document -> the frame (containing the larger table; has optimal
wrap) does not fill the left column. Thus the second table is partially hidden
behind this frame.
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2003-10-01 09:10:31 UTC 
Created attachment 9860 [details]
Document containing section and frame
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2003-10-01 09:20:29 UTC 
Target 2.0.
Comment 3 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2003-10-02 10:14:28 UTC 
OD (02.10.2003):
First of all, a frame, which is anchored inside a section doesn't have
to expand the section - it can overlap and/or exceed the section bottom.
Then, the small table doesn't wrap around the frame, containing the
large table, because a table wraps around a frame, if frame has the
wrapping:
- 'None', or
- 'Before', or
- 'After', or
- 'Parallel' with position 'left'/'right'.
But, that's not all. The algorithm, which balance a columned section,
doesn't consider correctly objects, which are anchored inside the
section and overlaps the section, such that a complete column width is
taken.

Due to the fact that this issue is a follow-up of issue #19853 and MS
Word doesn't behave consistent in the 'expansion of the section', we
have to decide, what do. The mentioned inconsistence can be reproduced
by moving the large table to different positions - sometimes the
section expands, sometimes not.

OD->MRU: Let's have a closer look together and discuss possible solutions.
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2004-01-27 12:32:31 UTC 
MRU->BH: I think, we need a new compatibility option for the two different
behaviours regarding (non-) expanding sections.
Comment 5 bettina.haberer 2004-01-30 13:57:49 UTC 
Hello Frank, I think we should try to find a conclusion about that irritating
current behaviour. Could you please take the ownership of this issue? Thank you.
Comment 6 frank.loehmann 2004-08-13 17:34:15 UTC 
Changed target due to effort.
Comment 7 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2004-08-16 07:05:19 UTC 
OD->FL:
Checkout SRC680m50 - document looks good to me.
Comment 8 frank.loehmann 2005-07-25 16:49:47 UTC 
Change issue type to enhancement.