Issue 21022 - vertical-fed Envelope is not printed centered / Lexmark printer
Summary: vertical-fed Envelope is not printed centered / Lexmark printer
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 25342
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: h.ilter
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-10 15:28 UTC by teledyn
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description teledyn 2003-10-10 15:28:49 UTC
Using insert/envelope and selecting a vertical insertion for the envelope the
two addresses are not centered in the space; the envelope must be inserted
almost an inch to the right or the recipient address will be cut off along the
bottom edge -- because the envelope is not grasped by my Lexmark printer feed
guides, the envelope drifts off alignment as it prints.

Also, the sender address should be in a smaller font, and there should be a form
element to allow inserting an "attn" line and also a reference number.
Comment 1 mci 2004-01-07 13:04:53 UTC
.
Comment 2 flibby05 2004-04-22 19:16:19 UTC
adding "Lexmark" to Description
Comment 3 flibby05 2004-05-04 21:26:48 UTC
hi, thanks for reporting this!

we are aware of various deficiencies concerning "printing envelopes" in the
current implementation of OpenOffice.org.
Things are being worked on in issue 20057.
A complete and overall bugfix will be incorporated into OpenOffice.org 2.0.

schedule plan for version 2.0 is available here:
http://development.openoffice.org/releases/OpenOffice_org_trunk.html
Comment 4 h.ilter 2004-05-05 09:19:27 UTC
I'll see.
Comment 5 h.ilter 2004-05-07 15:09:23 UTC
Seems to be dublicate to 25342
The part begining with "Also..." is an Enhancement.
Please write down one case only.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 25342 ***
Comment 6 h.ilter 2004-05-18 15:04:25 UTC
.