Issue 21590 - Line thickness below 0.04 cm is too small on EPS export
Summary: Line thickness below 0.04 cm is too small on EPS export
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 18607
Alias: None
Product: Draw
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial with 3 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: AOO Later
Assignee: thb
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-22 22:36 UTC by mini
Modified: 2007-11-06 16:34 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
The original SXD file. (8.46 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-10-22 22:50 UTC, mini
no flags Details
The resulting EPS file (93.52 KB, application/postscript)
2003-10-22 22:59 UTC, mini
no flags Details
The resulting EPS file (93.52 KB, application/postscript)
2003-10-22 23:10 UTC, mini
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description mini 2003-10-22 22:36:45 UTC
When exporting to EPS, a line thickness below 0.04 cm results in a *very* thin
line, not at all like OOo draws it. A 0.03cm thick line looks much thinner than
75% of a 0.04cm thick line. 

OOo should be able to export even such thin lines to EPS.

Attaching testcase. The testcase has *one* line of 0.04cm thickness, and the
rest are all 0.03cm.
Comment 1 mini 2003-10-22 22:50:24 UTC
Created attachment 10566 [details]
The original SXD file.
Comment 2 mini 2003-10-22 22:59:34 UTC
Created attachment 10567 [details]
The resulting EPS file
Comment 3 mini 2003-10-22 23:10:13 UTC
Created attachment 10568 [details]
The resulting EPS file
Comment 4 wolframgarten 2003-10-23 07:35:26 UTC
Reproducible.
Comment 5 wolframgarten 2003-10-23 07:35:45 UTC
Reassigned to Sven.
Comment 6 sven.jacobi 2003-10-27 15:29:45 UTC
Hi Thorsten,
can you please takeover this bug.
Comment 7 thb 2003-11-21 14:06:20 UTC
Might be related to the fact that we do our own stroke processing in certain cases. Will 
have a look, but this will probably not match the criteria for 2.0.
Comment 8 mini 2005-05-27 23:41:12 UTC
No surprise for you I guess, but this problem still exists in m104.

/Mikael
Comment 9 christian.guenther 2007-11-06 16:30:22 UTC
duplicate to issue 18607

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 18607 ***
Comment 10 christian.guenther 2007-11-06 16:34:05 UTC
I close the issue as duplicate.