Issue 23886 - Problems with sizing text in ole 2.0 object
Summary: Problems with sizing text in ole 2.0 object
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 23888
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P2 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-12-26 13:52 UTC by helmutw
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:38 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
testfiles, created with openoffice 1.0 and 1.1 (24.00 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-12-26 13:56 UTC, helmutw 		no flags Details
textfile, created with openoffice 1.1 (23.00 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-12-26 13:56 UTC, helmutw 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description helmutw 2003-12-26 13:52:24 UTC 
The graph is a Novograph (www.novograph.com) Chartist OLE2.0 object. The texts 
should be readable without beeing cut off. This works perfect up to OpenOffice 
1.0 but not from OpenOffice 1.1 RC1 on up to 1.1.0 from 2003-09-22. The result 
is the same with the brand new 4.2 version of Chartist. I am positive that the 
problem is with OpenOffice 1.1 from RC1 on.


It also does not matter, if the document was saved as an .sdw or sxw document. 
Things did work correct up to OpenOffice 1.0.3 version.
Comment 1 helmutw 2003-12-26 13:56:12 UTC 
Created attachment 12120 [details]
testfiles, created with openoffice 1.0 and 1.1
Comment 2 helmutw 2003-12-26 13:56:58 UTC 
Created attachment 12121 [details]
textfile, created with openoffice 1.1
Comment 3 Martin Hollmichel 2004-02-24 18:20:34 UTC 
set component
Comment 4 helmutw 2004-02-25 18:29:22 UTC 
Issues 23886 and 23888 are the same. I had filed issue 23886 first as 
a 'testissue' to see how the issue system works. After I had found out, I filed 
the same deal again as 'regular'. It now was registered under the issue number 
23888. There is an additional attachement to be found under 23888.
Comment 5 h.ilter 2004-03-02 12:20:32 UTC 
Reassigned to MRU
Comment 6 michael.ruess 2004-03-02 13:43:30 UTC 
Duplicate of issue 23888.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 23888 ***
Comment 7 michael.ruess 2004-03-02 13:44:37 UTC 
Closed as duplicate.