Issue 25823 - Conversion of cross-references to HTML links
Summary: Conversion of cross-references to HTML links
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 9115
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: eric.savary
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-02-24 11:07 UTC by wiz21
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: FEATURE
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description wiz21 2004-02-24 11:07:14 UTC 
This is related to Issue 9115.

It'd be nice to have cross-reference in OO documents converted to hyper-links 
in HTML documents.

Cross-references like "see page 3" don't convert well into HTML. Moreover, 
hyperlinks (which translate correctly into HTML) are not very nice in OO text 
and totally useless once printed. 

Although, in issue 8115 on says that hyperlinks and cross-refernce are not 
alike, I think they are covering the same concept : a way to go from one place 
to a piece of information, whereever it is (which is different of "going from 
one place to antohre place").

For people exporting content to various places, cross-reference convrsion is a 
must.
Comment 1 wiz21 2004-02-24 13:23:35 UTC 
Typo ! Issue 8_1_1_5  should be read Issue 9115
Comment 2 jack.warchold 2004-02-25 11:08:15 UTC 
html issue

reassigened to es

can you please take a look on this issue?

set target not determined
Comment 3 h.ilter 2004-03-05 13:18:47 UTC 
Reassigned to ES
Comment 4 eric.savary 2004-03-05 14:47:25 UTC 
Issue 9115 covers exactly the same problem thus this one is duplicate.
You may comment issue 9115 but as it is flagged WONTFIX I'd don't think it has a
chance to get "reactivated".
You may discuss this point in the discuss mailinglists and let people vote for it.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 9115 ***
Comment 5 eric.savary 2004-03-05 14:47:42 UTC 
closed