Issue 26392 - Superscript character not in correct position when coverted to Word XP SP3
Summary: Superscript character not in correct position when coverted to Word XP SP3
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 25556
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-03-12 12:54 UTC by cyocum
Modified: 2004-03-12 14:18 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
OOo 1.1.0 Writer file with superscript character (5.14 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.writer)
2004-03-12 12:55 UTC, cyocum 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description cyocum 2004-03-12 12:54:19 UTC 
1. Type 63d in Writer
2. Hightlight the letter "d"
3. Right click on the letter "d"
4. Choose "Character"
5. In the Position Tab change it to "Superscript"
6. Save as WordXP File
7. Open in WordXP SP3

Notice that the letter "d" is now far above the number 63.
Comment 1 cyocum 2004-03-12 12:55:25 UTC 
Created attachment 13746 [details]
OOo 1.1.0 Writer file with superscript character
Comment 2 flibby05 2004-03-12 13:15:22 UTC 
quoting from issue 25556:

------- Additional comments from mru Tue Feb 17 04:15:54 -0800 2004 -------

Yeah, problem is, that 
 a) Word does not have a feature for explicit "super-/subscript" font size
 b) Writer calculates "raised by" relatively in % and Word does it absolutely in pt.

Thus, there will alwasy be a kind of miscalculation when translating between
Writer and Word format. If there should be full compatibility, the
sub-/superscript algorthm/concept has to be adapted.


proposal: close as Duplicate of issue 25556.
Comment 3 michael.ruess 2004-03-12 14:13:28 UTC 
This is definitely a duplicate of issue 25556.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 25556 ***
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2004-03-12 14:18:45 UTC 
Closed as duplicate.