Issue 28328 - CTRL-Z in table rewinds the document to the beginning
Summary: CTRL-Z in table rewinds the document to the beginning
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 18014
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1.1
Hardware: PC All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: openoffice
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-04-24 15:12 UTC by stastnj1
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:43 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description stastnj1 2004-04-24 15:12:10 UTC 
Situation:
table, cursor positioned in the last line, last cell

press tab -> a new row is appended 
press CTRL-Z to undo append a new row, 
  the empty new row is deleted, the cursor jumps to the very beginning of the
document.
I think it should either stay just below the table or return to one of the cells
in the last row of the table (preferable to this just above the cursor).
Comment 1 flibby05 2004-04-24 17:34:46 UTC 
confirming behaviour with 1.1.2rc linux build,

however if the reason why issue 2961 and also 3061 was closed invalid would also
have to be applied for this issue:

from issue 2961:

------- Additional comments from sba Mon Jan 28 10:40:01 -0700 2002 -------

For performance reasons, editing styles is never stored in the undo buffer. Undo
is dedicated mainly for document content. Sytyles 
are part of the layout, not content.
Comment 2 flibby05 2004-04-24 17:36:53 UTC 
maxweber -> QA:
should we close this as duplicate of 2961 or is this issue a completely
different case?
Comment 3 michael.ruess 2004-04-26 09:53:11 UTC 
No, this issue is completely different and does not deal anyway with Undo in Styles.

MRU->HBRINKM: another annoying variant of "Undo in table pushes cursor to first
position in document". Should be fixed for OO 2.0.
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2004-05-07 15:45:52 UTC 
Should be a duplicate of issue 18014. Please close or reassign this one to QA.
Comment 5 openoffice 2004-05-24 16:29:31 UTC 
duplicate

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 18014 ***
Comment 6 Mathias_Bauer 2007-02-05 13:56:27 UTC 
going to close ancient issues
Comment 7 Mathias_Bauer 2007-02-05 13:59:22 UTC 
closing ancient issues