Issue 29319 - Allow a string to be marked as "do not break"
Summary: Allow a string to be marked as "do not break"
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 19716
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1.1
Hardware: Other All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-05-18 17:20 UTC by ftack
Modified: 2004-05-18 21:33 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: FEATURE
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Small file illustrating some unwanted breaking (5.25 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.writer)
2004-05-18 17:21 UTC, ftack
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description ftack 2004-05-18 17:20:37 UTC
In some instances, a user may not want a string to break. For example, the
string "function_name()" eventually may break at "()". Another example is a
chemical formula containing braces such as Fe(H<SUB>2<S/UB>O)<SUB>6</SUB>. We
want this to stay together and never break.

In old Wodperfect for Dos, one could select a string and mark it not to break.
This would be a welcome feature to Writer as well.

Currently, the issue may be worked around by inserting the string as a math
object, but this is clearly not an elegant solution. In attachment, I included a
very small document illustrating the issue.
Comment 1 ftack 2004-05-18 17:21:36 UTC
Created attachment 15328 [details]
Small file illustrating some unwanted breaking
Comment 2 lohmaier 2004-05-18 21:33:35 UTC
duplicate.
This is not hyphenation but a word-wrap bug.

To avoid hyphenation, set the language of the word/expression to "none" or add
it to your dictionary with "=" appended ("dont_break=") But again, that OOo
wraps the text to the new line at paranthesis is not hyphenation but regular
"text flow", solved for OOo 2.0 (you can try with a current developer snapshot
like 680m36)

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 19716 ***
Comment 3 lohmaier 2004-05-18 21:33:54 UTC
closing duplicate.