Issue 3117 - Cursor placement too limited when using the thesarus
Summary: Cursor placement too limited when using the thesarus
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: 641
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: steffen.grund
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
: 10778 (view as issue list)
Depends on: 11993
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2002-02-17 04:47 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:41 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2002-02-17 04:47:18 UTC
When the cursor is at the end of a word and the user brings up the thesarus, 
either by pressing ctrl-F7 or going to the tools menu, a word is not 
automatically selected in the thesarus.  Instead, a user must highlight the 
word for it to be selected.  I think the OpenOffice thesarus should be set to 
select a word for the thesarus when the cursor is in 1. at the beginning of the 
word, 2. at the end of the word, or 3. in between any of the letters of the 
word the user wishes to look up in the thesarus.  It would make things much, 
much easier for people who frequently use the thesarus.

Thank you,

RA
Comment 1 thomas.lange 2002-02-18 09:14:42 UTC
TL: It should work the same way in OpenOffice as in StarOffice.
For example if you have the word "General" you may place the cursor 
from right before the 'G' to right before the 'l' (not right after(!) 
though) to start the thesaurus with the word the cursor is in.

TL->SBA: Is the behavior in OpenOffice different from the one in 
StarOffice?
Comment 2 stefan.baltzer 2002-02-22 14:11:42 UTC
Reassigned to Michael.
Comment 3 michael.ruess 2002-02-25 13:15:33 UTC
The behaviour in StarOffice/OpenOffice is the same. But in comparision
to SO 5.2, it got a little bit worse. I StarOffice 5.2 it was also
possible to place the cursor right after the word and then call the
Thesaurus. This little Feature we lost. Also when a word is followed
be a comma and the cursor is placed between the comma and the word,
the Thesaurus dialog shows the comma as expression. Here SO 5.2 worked
also much better.
Comment 4 thomas.lange 2002-03-11 08:05:25 UTC
(empty comment)
Comment 5 thomas.lange 2003-02-05 08:52:10 UTC
*** Issue 10778 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 6 michael.ruess 2003-02-12 10:21:44 UTC
lowered priority to 3. Issue is not essential.
Comment 7 thomas.lange 2003-02-12 10:33:28 UTC
Changed type back to defect since it was OK in SO 5.0.
Comment 8 thomas.lange 2003-02-18 12:15:04 UTC
It looks like internal bug #106385# should be integrated before this 
is getting fixed. Will ask Karl which version that will be.

The place where this is to be fixed then is 
sw/*/txtedt.cxx:
  XubString SwTxtNode::GetCurWord( xub_StrLen nPos )
Comment 9 thomas.lange 2003-02-19 09:30:34 UTC
Need to wait for CWS i18n03 (i.e. internal bug #106385#) to be 
integrated before proceeding with this one.
Comment 10 thomas.lange 2003-02-21 10:00:25 UTC
CWS i18n03 is integrated in SRX644 m4s3.
That is this one can be fixed in a CWS based upon m5.
Comment 11 thomas.lange 2003-03-03 14:51:27 UTC
Files changed:
sw:
  txtedt.cxx 1.37.2.2.32.1

See also #i11993#, when that issue is fixed the fix to this one 
should be functional without further code modifications.
Comment 12 thomas.lange 2003-03-03 14:54:32 UTC
The fix itself should be in CWS sw008.
Comment 13 thomas.lange 2003-03-17 14:09:28 UTC
TL: reopened.

Fix will remain in CWS sw008 and be integrated with that CWS.

Since it can be verified only when #i11993# got fixed I reopen it for 
now.

Comment 14 thomas.lange 2003-03-17 14:19:30 UTC
TL->Karl: For the time being I reassign this one to you since I may 
not notice when #i11993# gets fixed.

If that one is fixed please hand this one over back to me and state 
the version where #i11993# will be integrated in order for me to 
check this bug again.
Comment 15 karl.hong 2003-04-05 01:28:02 UTC
Karl->TL: i11993 is fixed in CWS apps61beta2. Please check it.
Comment 16 thomas.lange 2003-04-16 08:44:21 UTC
With my part being done already in sw008 there should ne nothing left
than to test that everything is working in CWS apps61beta2.
Comment 17 thomas.lange 2003-04-17 14:28:36 UTC
.
Comment 18 thomas.lange 2003-04-17 14:29:12 UTC
.
Comment 19 thomas.lange 2003-04-17 14:29:30 UTC
.
Comment 20 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann 2003-04-22 08:44:01 UTC
OD->MRU (22.04.2003):
Checked in internal installation set of CWS apps61beta2. Please verify.
Comment 21 michael.ruess 2003-04-23 15:17:33 UTC
Checked fix with CWS apps61beta2
Comment 22 michael.ruess 2003-04-23 15:35:56 UTC
Verified. Fix will be included in OO 1.1 Beta.
Comment 23 michael.ruess 2003-04-24 14:06:08 UTC
due to problems while fixing #11993 this fix will happen earliest in
OO 1.1 final. Sorry!
Comment 24 michael.ruess 2003-04-24 14:09:16 UTC
Changed target to 1.1 final.
Comment 25 thomas.lange 2003-05-15 11:35:50 UTC
.
Comment 26 thomas.lange 2003-05-19 15:41:36 UTC
TL: As dicussed with MI I will change the target to OO 2.0 in order to
have time to discuss this and it' impact in more detail.
Comment 27 steffen.grund 2004-04-01 14:15:42 UTC
reassign.
Comment 28 steffen.grund 2004-04-01 14:16:25 UTC
tested on src680_m33, bug is fixed.
Comment 29 steffen.grund 2004-04-01 14:19:12 UTC
bug closed.