Issue 33936 - Printer font visualization
Summary: Printer font visualization
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 26332
Alias: None
Product: gsl
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 680m51
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P5 (lowest) Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: hdu@apache.org
QA Contact: issues@gsl
URL:
Keywords: needmoreinfo, oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-09-07 15:51 UTC by esperantisto
Modified: 2004-09-17 07:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
dummytext, formatted with "Kruti Dev 010"-font (84.58 KB, image/png)
2004-09-13 18:17 UTC, lohmaier 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description esperantisto 2004-09-07 15:51:23 UTC 
Unlike Microsoft Word, OOo Writer is unable to visualize printer fonts. Example: 
the font Kruti Dev 010 (downloadable via link http://www.angelfire.com/pop/top4/
fonts/typing.zip). In this font, Latin letters are replaced with Devangari 
(Hindi) ones. MS Word both correctly visualizes and prints out texts formatted 
with that font. OOo replaces it with Arial when visualizing, although printing 
is OK. Can this be fixed?
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2004-09-08 06:39:00 UTC 
I think, fonts "embedded in the file fornat" has to be implemented for this...
Comment 2 lohmaier 2004-09-13 18:16:23 UTC 
no, this is not about fonts embedded in documents but OOo being unable to
display a *.ttf-Font -> changing back to defect, assigning to default owner.

No problem with linux though. (see screenshot)
Comment 3 lohmaier 2004-09-13 18:17:41 UTC 
Created attachment 17678 [details]
dummytext, formatted with "Kruti Dev 010"-font
Comment 4 lohmaier 2004-09-13 18:31:01 UTC 
seems to be a duplicate of issue 26332, but according to 
http://development.openoffice.org/releases/OOo_2_0_timetable.html
CWS fontlist02 has been integrated for m48, so maybe this is another problem.

Are you really using 680m51?
reassigning to gsl.
Comment 5 christof.pintaske 2004-09-14 11:38:06 UTC 
cp->hdu: indeed it sounds like a dupe to 26332, please have a look
Comment 6 esperantisto 2004-09-16 06:51:17 UTC 
-> cloph. Yes, I use m51. I have installed it over m49. Well, may that cause 
problems?
Comment 7 hdu@apache.org 2004-09-16 15:15:29 UTC 
The screenshot from the SRC680m51 version looks good to my untrained eye... can
you give us a hint where exactly the the problem is visible in this screenshot?
Comment 8 lohmaier 2004-09-16 19:38:31 UTC 
The screenshot doesn't show the problem. It did it using 1.9m51 using linux.
As issue 26332 has been a windows-only problem as well, I cannot tell wether
these two are duplicates/related. (It was meant as a "proof" that linux is not
affected)

maybe the reporter can upload a windows-screenshot showing the problem.

Sorry for the confusion.
Comment 9 esperantisto 2004-09-17 06:50:06 UTC 
-> hdu: the screenshot provided by cloph is exactly what it should be. 
Considering that, yesterday I've done a clean reinstall of OOo and the problem 
seems to have desappeared. It looks like the problem was about installing over a 
previous version and I've sort of false reported. I'm sorry and suggest to close 
the issue.
Comment 10 hdu@apache.org 2004-09-17 07:53:46 UTC 
Ok. From the original bug description it really looks like a duplicate to issue
26332, which is already fixed in >=SRC68m48. So if everyone agrees I'm closing it.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 26332 ***
Comment 11 hdu@apache.org 2004-09-17 07:54:42 UTC 
.