Issue 35607 - Strange/wrong insertion of line breaks when editing
Summary: Strange/wrong insertion of line breaks when editing
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 27336
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: editing (show other issues)
Version: OOo 1.1.3
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-10-15 11:13 UTC by ahjulsta
Modified: 2004-10-24 15:35 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Document that reproduces bug (6.35 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.writer)
2004-10-15 11:14 UTC, ahjulsta 		no flags Details
Screenshot (25.51 KB, image/png)
2004-10-15 12:36 UTC, ahjulsta 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description ahjulsta 2004-10-15 11:13:19 UTC 
Line breaks are inserted incorrectly when editing the attached document. 

To reproduce:  
- Open attached bug.sxw. 
- Place insertion mark at the end of the paragraph (just after the letter 'o'.
- Type for example 'tt. Fax' 

watch the hilarious (or disturbing) insertion of line breaks of movements of the
insertion mark.

I use 1.1.3 Norwegian on XP SP2.
Comment 1 ahjulsta 2004-10-15 11:14:11 UTC 
Created attachment 18427 [details]
Document that reproduces bug
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2004-10-15 12:09:11 UTC 
Hm, I don't have such a problem (tried wirth _OO 1.1.3 on Windows)... maybe I
just cannot see it. Please attach a screenshot, how it looks on your system.
Comment 3 ahjulsta 2004-10-15 12:36:53 UTC 
Created attachment 18433 [details]
Screenshot
Comment 4 ahjulsta 2004-10-15 12:38:46 UTC 
The attached screenshot is after typing

't'
't'
'.'
<backspace>

(just as an example)

The behaviour is strange regardless of having autocomplete on or off. (Not sure
if it is identical, though.)
Comment 5 ahjulsta 2004-10-15 12:43:43 UTC 
Changing the font to Times New Roman appears to fix the problem. The original
document used Palatino Linetype (v1.40), an OpenType-script (?) (Heidelberg
Druckmaschinen AG).

Maybe this is an issue with the font?
Comment 6 lohmaier 2004-10-24 15:34:46 UTC 
strange things with Palatino Linotype -> duplicate.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 27336 ***
Comment 7 lohmaier 2004-10-24 15:35:19 UTC 
closing duplicate.