Issue 36733 - Hebrew font entirely bold when opening 1.1.x file in 2.0
Summary: Hebrew font entirely bold when opening 1.1.x file in 2.0
Status: CLOSED IRREPRODUCIBLE
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: open-import (show other issues)
Version: 680m56
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: ulf.stroehler
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL: http://www.shlomifish.org/bugs/Shlomi...
Keywords: needmoreinfo, oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-11-05 11:29 UTC by shlomif
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:38 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Screenshot of the document as displayed by OOo 1.9m60 (36.66 KB, image/png)
2004-12-13 15:42 UTC, shlomif
no flags Details
1.9.62 Screenshot of the document (47.45 KB, image/png)
2004-12-13 16:25 UTC, shlomif
no flags Details
OOo 1.9.87 Screenshot of the Problematic File Under Mandrake 10.2 RC 2 (48.59 KB, image/png)
2005-03-31 16:31 UTC, shlomif
no flags Details
Font David CLM assigned to the text formatted with David (69.30 KB, image/png)
2005-06-23 12:16 UTC, lohmaier
no flags Details
File opened without assigning the David CLM manually, glyph-fallback kicks in. (56.52 KB, image/png)
2005-06-23 12:19 UTC, lohmaier
no flags Details
Screenshot of 1.9.113 (51.50 KB, image/png)
2005-07-14 01:11 UTC, shlomif
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description shlomif 2004-11-05 11:29:36 UTC
Opening the document in the link (which was created using OOo 1.1.x) with OOo
1.9.56 causes it to be opened with wrong display - there's no anti-aliasing, the
numbers look badly, etc.

I'm using it on Mandrake 10.1 Official Edition. Also, the PDF export causes it
to look badly as well.
Comment 1 mandreiana 2004-11-06 19:21:47 UTC
Looks acceptable to me in m60, could you please attach a screenshot?
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2004-11-11 14:29:25 UTC
reassigned to US.
Comment 3 shlomif 2004-11-11 19:27:40 UTC
Well, it looks better now, the fonts are OK. The only problem is that the 
Hebrew font is entirely bold. 
Comment 4 ulf.stroehler 2004-11-24 16:41:26 UTC
Displays quite nice for me. Pls. test again in forthcomming OO.o 1.9.64 and
comment. Thanks.
Comment 5 thackert 2004-12-12 17:27:54 UTC
Have you tried it with a later version of OOo (say 1.9.58, 60 or 62)? Does this problem occur there 
also? If not: Could you please close this issue?
Comment 6 shlomif 2004-12-13 15:42:13 UTC
Created attachment 20481 [details]
Screenshot of the document as displayed by OOo 1.9m60
Comment 7 shlomif 2004-12-13 15:43:40 UTC
OK, I checked with m60 (and am downloading m62 now and will check with it 
later). It is displayed incorrectly and I've attached a screenshot to prove 
it. Is anyone here also using OpenOffice on Mandrake? (preferably 10.1 
Official Edition)  
Comment 8 shlomif 2004-12-13 16:25:25 UTC
Created attachment 20483 [details]
1.9.62 Screenshot of the document
Comment 9 shlomif 2004-12-13 16:26:08 UTC
Still not good in 1.9.62 (at least not on Mandrake 10.1 OE) 
Comment 10 flibby05 2005-03-27 16:16:24 UTC
hi shlomif,
looks good here with m87 on SuSE 9.2
The font OOo is using here is 'David'.
The first line of the doc gets displayed as David, 16, Bold.
The text in the table gets displayed as David, 14, NON-Bold.
Comment 11 shlomif 2005-03-31 16:27:07 UTC
SHLOMIF->MAXWEBER: aarrggh! With OOo 1.9.87, there are many problems:
anti-aliased fonts, wrong fonts, mis-aligned lines, wrong vertical-alignment.
I'll attach a screenshot.

Comment 12 shlomif 2005-03-31 16:31:05 UTC
Created attachment 24477 [details]
OOo 1.9.87 Screenshot of the Problematic File Under Mandrake 10.2 RC 2
Comment 13 flibby05 2005-04-03 17:17:44 UTC
Cannot reprocude with m89 on SuSE 9.2,
 enabled CTL in Tools -> Options -> language settings -> languages.

Mandrake only issue?
Comment 14 thackert 2005-05-15 17:40:36 UTC
@shlomif: Have you tried it with a newer version of OOo than 1.9.87? Does this problem 
occurs there, too? Or could you close this issue, please? Cannot test it here, sorry ... :(
Comment 15 lohmaier 2005-06-23 01:34:43 UTC
Do you have the font installed at all? Where can one get the font "David"?
Comment 16 ulf.stroehler 2005-06-23 10:21:02 UTC
@cloph: afaik David is part of the culmus font package. Refer to:
http://culmus.sourceforge.net/main.html
Comment 17 lohmaier 2005-06-23 11:53:34 UTC
The culmus-package indeed contains a David Font, but it is called "David CLM"
and OOo doesn't know it as a replacement for "David" - one has to assign it
manually.

Furthermore It looks very different than in the screenshot. The David CLM is a
italic-style font.

If the font has the same design as "original" David, then it is clear that the
font is not installed and this issue probably is a worksforme.
Comment 18 lohmaier 2005-06-23 12:16:28 UTC
Created attachment 27443 [details]
Font David CLM assigned to the text formatted with David
Comment 19 lohmaier 2005-06-23 12:19:08 UTC
Created attachment 27444 [details]
File opened without assigning the David CLM manually, glyph-fallback kicks in.
Comment 20 lohmaier 2005-07-13 23:39:12 UTC
shlomif: Do you really have the font installed? Is the Culmus font the right one?
Comment 21 shlomif 2005-07-14 01:10:22 UTC
shlomif->cloph: I do have the Culmus fonts installed (and I think also the   
fonts from the Hebrew-enabled Windows). However, now that I've tried it on   
Mandriva 2005 LE with 1.9.113, the document is displayed all wrong. I will 
attach a screenshot shortly. 
Comment 22 shlomif 2005-07-14 01:11:25 UTC
Created attachment 27894 [details]
Screenshot of 1.9.113
Comment 23 shlomif 2005-07-14 09:35:32 UTC
Well, I've now temporarily switched to my Kubuntu 5.04 system. There, the  
document is initially opened with the "David" font completely anti-aliased  
(despite the fact that "David" is aliased to "David CLM" on my system) when I  
convert the entire document to "David CLM", it looks fine.  
  
Regards,  
  
       Shlomi Fish  
Comment 24 lohmaier 2005-07-25 20:29:45 UTC
If I interpret your comment correctly, then you don't have any problems on
another system. So the problem seems to lay somewhere in the configuration/libs
of the mandriva box.

Do you agree with closing this issue as worksforme?
Comment 25 lohmaier 2005-08-18 22:24:01 UTC
shlomif: Do you agree with closing? Or did I misunderstand your comment?
Comment 26 shlomif 2005-08-19 09:09:32 UTC
cloph: well, actually, I do have problems in this regard on the Kubuntu 
system, it's just that they're different, and can be resolved. You are right 
that the problem probably seems to lay somewhere in the Mandriva's 
configuration, and probably specific to it. 
 
I'd like to get to the bottom of the problem with the Mandriva configuration. 
Maybe it's a mismatch between OOo and Mandriva that has to be fixed. But if 
you feel it's appropriate to close this issue as WORKSFORME, then it's OK. 
 
  
Comment 27 lohmaier 2005-08-22 17:32:49 UTC
closing for now. Not reproducible.

I still think that it is a problem due to missing fonts.
Comment 28 lohmaier 2005-08-22 17:35:23 UTC
closing for now.

Feel free to reopen if you can give the necessary information to reproduce.