Issue 39341 - icon packaging code can't create multiple layered themes ...
Summary: icon packaging code can't create multiple layered themes ...
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Installation
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 680m66
Hardware: Other Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.0
Assignee: mmeeks
QA Contact: issues@installation
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks: 36518
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2004-12-20 15:29 UTC by mmeeks
Modified: 2010-11-10 23:14 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
packimages.pl change for multiple -c statements cf.gcc -I . -I .. etc. (3.27 KB, patch)
2004-12-20 17:30 UTC, mmeeks
no flags Details | Diff
trivial packimages makefile.mk patch (1.79 KB, patch)
2004-12-20 17:35 UTC, mmeeks
no flags Details | Diff
scp changes (5.77 KB, patch)
2004-12-21 12:23 UTC, mmeeks
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description mmeeks 2004-12-20 15:29:12 UTC
As above really; some patches to this & packimages.pl required.
Turning the image paths into real paths as a first step, then updating the
instsetoo_native/packimages makefile.
Comment 1 mmeeks 2004-12-20 15:30:01 UTC
Doing the work on cws 'industrial01'
Comment 2 mmeeks 2004-12-20 16:21:08 UTC
And, of course - it turns out this already works nicely in packimages.pl, so
it's just a few instsetoo_native changes required.
Comment 3 mmeeks 2004-12-20 17:25:26 UTC
also, requires some config_office changes & in fact packimages.pl changes are
necessary - since most custom icon sets will want to fall-back through
Industrial to the default set - since they will be 24x24 & 16x16 not 26x26 and
16x16.
Comment 4 mmeeks 2004-12-20 17:30:46 UTC
Created attachment 20692 [details]
packimages.pl change for multiple -c statements cf.gcc -I . -I .. etc.
Comment 5 mmeeks 2004-12-20 17:35:10 UTC
Created attachment 20693 [details]
trivial packimages makefile.mk patch
Comment 6 mmeeks 2004-12-21 12:23:22 UTC
Ingo - any chance you can look at the scp2/ changes [ in the style of the
babelfish cws & incorporating that prj/build.lst work ], to build the images.inc
file.
Initially I made this define a macro that could then be invoked in ooo_files.scp
- I don't know if you prefer that ? [ making it more 'pure' include - but this
complicated the code a little ].

Input much appreciated; clearly this depends on cws babelfish getting nominated
now I guess.
Comment 7 mmeeks 2004-12-21 12:23:58 UTC
Created attachment 20727 [details]
scp changes
Comment 8 ingo.schmidt-rosbiegal 2004-12-21 15:10:54 UTC
Well, it looks really interesting ;-)
I would prefer, that you do not include the inc file into the file_ooo.scp. Why
don't you create the complete scp file, or at least use a nearly empty
file_images_ooo.scp, which contains only the header and the include input. Then
you only have to add the file_images_ooo.par into the util/makefile.mk for
OpenOffice. 
But if this works, it is of course also okay.
(Please remove the flag SETUPZIP, it is no longer supported).
IS -> Ause: How is CUSTOM_IMAGE_SETS defined for StarOffice?
Comment 9 mmeeks 2005-01-05 14:16:26 UTC
Ingo - I've done as you suggested - a new, small file that just does this
include for the images. I guess getting some review of the packimages change
would be good - Ause - are you ok with that ? [ in the meantime I'll re-sync the
cws to m68 ]
Comment 10 hjs 2005-01-05 15:16:48 UTC
the patches for "packimages.pl" and the makefile look fine (did no explicit
check though).
there is just a minor issue in the makefile of some "/" which should be "$/".
Comment 11 mmeeks 2005-01-06 16:06:40 UTC
Thanks Hans, committed that fix - so that's about it here I guess.
Comment 12 quetschke 2005-01-16 20:19:38 UTC
I verified that industrial01 builds for W32-tcsh and that all the code changes/new
code look sensible.

The new file_images_ooo.* and generation by scp/macros/ stuff was proposed
by Ingo (and hereby IMHO preaproved) so that I declare this verified.
Comment 13 ace_dent 2008-05-06 17:29:12 UTC
A Closed issue, is a Happy issue.

Regards
Andrew
Comment 14 dismetiner 2010-11-10 23:14:12 UTC
Created attachment 73828