Issue 4293 - Automatic selection of the Initial or Subsequent Bibiliographic Database Citation Formats
Summary: Automatic selection of the Initial or Subsequent Bibiliographic Database Cita...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 4292
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: 641
Hardware: Other Other OS
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: bettina.haberer
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL: http://www.users.bigpond.com/dnwilson...
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on: 4292
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2002-04-28 07:13 UTC by dnwilson
Modified: 2008-05-18 00:03 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description dnwilson 2002-04-28 07:13:07 UTC
I have Split my Bibliographic Database enhancement proposals into 4 seperate proposals.     
My full proposal and links to relevant wweb based information is at     
http://www.users.bigpond.com/dnwilson/biblio1.html     
     
Proposal 2.    
This is dependent on Proposal 1 Issue 4292 being accepted.  
   
Proposal to add Support for the Automatic selection of the Initial or Subsequent Citation Formats as text is edited.  
There is a tedious and fault prone aspects of the footnote / endnote citation method ? the maintenance the Initial and  
Subsequent citations in the correct order as one edits the text. In the  mad rush to complete the paper as the  
deadline approaches, a piece of text is moved and the Initial Citation reference now comes after the Subsequent  
reference, and the examiner gives you a red mark.   
I do not know enough about the internals of OpenOffice to suggest how this would be implemented. Two options would be  
to include a check after each edit or to check and adjust when the update fields function is activated.
Comment 1 stefan.baltzer 2002-08-19 15:21:09 UTC
Reassigned to Christian.
Comment 2 christian.jansen 2003-03-24 07:48:39 UTC
Reassiged to Bettina.
Comment 3 dnwilson 2003-08-18 23:21:34 UTC
added dependency on 4292 
Comment 4 dnwilson 2006-04-14 23:07:40 UTC
This issue is covered by the footnote citation issue. 
 
 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 4292 ***
Comment 5 ace_dent 2008-05-17 21:58:19 UTC
The Issue you raised has been marked as 'Resolved' and not updated within the
last 1 year+. I am therefore setting this issue to 'Verified' as the first step
towards Closing it. If you feel this is incorrect, please re-open the issue and
add any comments.

Many thanks,
Andrew
 
Cleaning-up and Closing old Issues
~ The Grand Bug Squash, pre v3 ~
http://marketing.openoffice.org/3.0/announcementbeta.html
Comment 6 ace_dent 2008-05-18 00:03:13 UTC
As per previous posting: Verified -> Closed.
A Closed Issue is a Happy Issue (TM).

Regards,
Andrew