Issue 44204 - Icons look bad on non-white backgrounds
Summary: Icons look bad on non-white backgrounds
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 40912
Alias: None
Product: ui
Classification: Code
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0 Beta
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: stefan.baltzer
QA Contact: issues@ui
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-03-06 01:02 UTC by iqgryn
Modified: 2005-03-07 01:07 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Screenshot of icons on default desktop color (22.61 KB, image/jpeg)
2005-03-06 01:04 UTC, iqgryn 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description iqgryn 2005-03-06 01:02:57 UTC 
The file icons for OpenOffice.org 2.0 Beta look bad on non-white backgrounds. 
The edges seem to have been improperly or incompletely alpha-blended.  A minor
issue, but it really should be fixed before the final release.  The public and
it's first impressions, yada yada.  I'll attach a screenshot in a sec.
Comment 1 iqgryn 2005-03-06 01:04:20 UTC 
Created attachment 23399 [details]
Screenshot of icons on default desktop color
Comment 2 iqgryn 2005-03-06 01:07:35 UTC 
Note about the screenshot:

I selected two of the icons before I took the shot because the selected ones
look (much) better than the nonselected ones.  But, if you look closely at the
right side of them, kinda near the bottom, there's still a little raggedness. 
Again, a very minor issue.  

Another Note:

I make no claims to actually understanding alpha-blending, I just know that
everyone else manages to make their icons look good on any background, and I've
heard that's what they use to do it.
Comment 3 Matthias Basler 2005-03-07 01:07:16 UTC 
Correct, but it's a duplicate issue, unfortumately.
Add yourself for the CC of issue 40912 to stay informed on this topic.
Thanks.


*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 40912 ***
Comment 4 Matthias Basler 2005-03-07 01:07:57 UTC 
.