Issue 47809 - Emphasis mark like "-". long accent in japanese romaji
Summary: Emphasis mark like "-". long accent in japanese romaji
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 5991
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: formatting (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0 Beta
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: requirements
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-04-20 11:12 UTC by kaiuku
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description kaiuku 2005-04-20 11:12:41 UTC
In the Character > Font Effects, we have choice of some Emphasis marks, namely
Dot, Circle, Disc, Accent. Would it be possible, in a future version, to add a
horizontal bar, something like "-" (without quotes, of course). Numerical digits
with a vertical bar above are normally used to indicate negative values of some
indices and is the long accent for japanese romaji
Comment 1 michael.ruess 2005-04-20 11:44:48 UTC
Reassigned to SBA.
Comment 2 stefan.baltzer 2005-04-27 08:49:11 UTC
SBA->Kaiku: Thanks for supporting OpenOffice.org.

SBA->FT: Please take over, Thank you.
Comment 3 falko.tesch 2005-05-09 13:38:06 UTC
FT: Yes, it would.
Comment 4 falko.tesch 2005-05-09 13:38:45 UTC
.
Comment 5 acli 2006-03-24 21:30:31 UTC
The Japanese long accent should properly be entered as a macron. It is already
supported (since OOo 1.0) if the user's IME supports entering macrons, or if the
user uses "Insert special characters". Provided that the font also supports
macrons, too, of course.

However, in any case, this looks like a dup of issue 5991, or the two can be
merged somehow. Personally I think 5991's analysis (i.e., the line in technical
literature is an overline instead of an emphasis mark) is more correct.
Comment 6 lohmaier 2006-03-25 21:36:37 UTC
duplicate

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 5991 ***
Comment 7 lohmaier 2006-03-25 21:36:55 UTC
closing duplicate