Issue 53511 - WW8: Table with all rows set as heading behaves differently in OO
Summary: WW8: Table with all rows set as heading behaves differently in OO
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 48421
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: open-import (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0 Beta
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: frank.loehmann
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-18 17:52 UTC by dmccan
Modified: 2005-08-19 12:16 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Word doc with table not showing all data in OO writer (41.50 KB, application/msword)
2005-08-18 17:53 UTC, dmccan 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description dmccan 2005-08-18 17:52:24 UTC 
Document with table first created in OO 1.9.122 sent home and edited in Word
2000.  Back at work pages missing from table.  Open document in Word 2000 pages
there.  Open document in OO 1.4 pages there.  Defect with OO 1.9.122.
Comment 1 dmccan 2005-08-18 17:53:42 UTC 
Created attachment 28897 [details]
Word doc with table not showing all data in OO writer
Comment 2 michael.ruess 2005-08-19 11:41:59 UTC 
There is a problem with the "repeated heading rows" in the table. The whole
table is marked as "Repeated heading" (see in MS Word, table menu).
As a workaround in OpenOffice, go to the table's properties dialog and set the
"Repeat headings" from 40 to 1. This will correct it at first.

MRU->FL: When all rows of such a large table are marked as "Heading to be
repeated", Writer should also ignore the settings. This behaviour might be quite
more useful. I think, this can be solved for next release in connection with
issue 48421. Please decide. Thanks.
Comment 3 frank.loehmann 2005-08-19 12:16:06 UTC 
Same problem like issue 48421. I have added a recommendation to that issue.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 48421 ***
Comment 4 frank.loehmann 2005-08-19 12:16:35 UTC 
Closed