Issue 55191 - OO Base: footnote count in report
Summary: OO Base: footnote count in report
Alias: None
Product: Base
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 680m130
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Reported: 2005-09-28 15:02 UTC by kaulisch
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:45 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

test file (3.02 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.base)
2006-01-03 18:51 UTC, lars
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description kaulisch 2005-09-28 15:03:18 UTC
I have started to create a report in OO Base. I want to add a footnote to one of
the column headings. This is as such not a problem and in the "edit"- view of
the report the footnote is numbered as 1 (correct). But if I run the report than
the footenote number is 2.

In the first phase of the running the report (with the example text) the
footnote number appears to be 1, but if all the data is displayed the footenote
number is 2.
Comment 1 kaulisch 2005-10-27 08:07:08 UTC
the problem still exists in version OO 2.0
Comment 2 kaulisch 2006-01-02 14:12:17 UTC
problem still exists in 2.01
Comment 3 lars 2006-01-03 18:46:44 UTC
confirmed on Windows XP Pro SP2 with OOo 2.0.1; use the attached file to create 
a report: add all fields, everything else leave as default, modify report 
layout, add a footnote: it is numbered 1 in "the edit view", and numbered 2 in 
the "executed view"
Comment 4 lars 2006-01-03 18:51:57 UTC
Created attachment 32877 [details]
test file
Comment 5 marc.neumann 2006-01-05 08:30:42 UTC

I can reproduce this, reassign it to the right developer and set target.

Bye Marc
Comment 6 ocke.janssen 2006-05-18 13:17:41 UTC
Seems to be a writer problem. Please take a look on it. Thanks.
Comment 7 kaulisch 2007-04-11 16:57:56 UTC
I tested this issue again (with OOo 2.2). It seems that the problem is fixed.
Comment 8 enpizafapw 2010-11-10 17:44:16 UTC
Created attachment 73573