Issue 56710 - Define Handling of Hyperlinks in OOo
Summary: Define Handling of Hyperlinks in OOo
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 22133
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 2.x
Assignee: frank.loehmann
QA Contact: issues@framework
Depends on:
Reported: 2005-10-26 14:29 UTC by frank.loehmann
Modified: 2007-05-03 14:49 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description frank.loehmann 2005-10-26 14:29:44 UTC
The new Security tab page in OOo 2.0 does not allow to define the hyperlink
handling anymore. The replacement for this, already planned for OOo 2.0, has not
been implemented due to lack of resources. For OOo 3.0 we have to re-consider
the handling of hyperlinks (in and external) for all apps.

Link to OOo 2.0 spec:

"Normal Writer Edit Mode Behavior

A tip help is shown (see string table below for details) when the mouse is
placed on a URL. If the CTRL key is pressed, the i-beam cursor changes to a
finger cursor and a click on the link opens the URL in the system's browser.

String list
'<URL> CTRL+click to follow link'
'<URL> Strg+Klick zum Verfolgen der Verknüpfung'

If target is not within the current document.
The URL tip help is limited to a width of 45 characters, because URLs could
become very long."
Comment 1 frank.loehmann 2006-07-13 16:41:54 UTC
set target to OOo 2.x
Comment 2 kpalagin 2007-05-03 12:24:47 UTC
This issue seems to be dup
id=22133, which has 7 votes.

We also have

Shall we consolidate all of them in one and get it going?
Kirill Palagin.
Comment 3 Mathias_Bauer 2007-05-03 13:44:26 UTC
If somebody "consolidated" all these issues into one noone would object. :-)
Comment 4 kpalagin 2007-05-03 14:42:47 UTC
Dup of
Resolving as such.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 22133 ***
Comment 5 kpalagin 2007-05-03 14:49:32 UTC
and closing.

P.S. Would anybody object to targeting 22133? ;-)