Issue 61465 - Thai installation set should be bilingual by default - with Thai and en_US UI
Summary: Thai installation set should be bilingual by default - with Thai and en_US UI
Status: CLOSED WONT_FIX
Alias: None
Product: Installation
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0.1
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: hjs
QA Contact: issues@installation
URL:
Keywords:
: 64989 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-01 10:12 UTC by samphan
Modified: 2007-02-06 12:11 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: FEATURE
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description samphan 2006-02-01 10:12:03 UTC
Translation for OOo has been done for Thai in 2.0.1. Even though many Thai will
like the Thai UI, many will be confused and prefer the English UI. Therefore the
Thai installer must include both Thai and en_US UI. Currently, the build process
is producing only Thai installation set. It should be changed to include both
Thai and en_US.
Comment 1 Olaf Felka 2006-02-01 10:15:05 UTC
@ is: Something for you?
Comment 2 pavel 2006-02-01 10:19:38 UTC
Just adding th to the following list?

bin/modules/installer/globals.pm:       @noMSLocaleLangs = ( "dz", "km", "nr",
"ns", "rw", "ss", "st", "ts", "tn", "ve", "xh", "zu" , "ne" , "bn", "bn-BD",
"bn-IN", "lo", "cy" );
Comment 3 ingo.schmidt-rosbiegal 2006-02-01 12:57:04 UTC
I do not like the solution to use @noMSLocaleLangs. This forces the creation of
bilingual installation sets. But this is not necessary for Thai, because the
Windows Installer works fine with Thai. 
If you want bilingual installation sets, just create them in instsetoo_native
(dmake openoffice_en-US_th), but we do not need to force this. Therefore I
think, there is nothing to do. 
Comment 4 pavel 2006-02-01 19:55:43 UTC
is: I agree with you.

If it works in Windows even without en-US, it should not be forced. And you can use

dmake openoffice_en-US_th

is: I think we can fix it with WONTFIX because the processes and makefiles
inside OOo doesn't prevent to generate dual language instsets.
Comment 5 samphan 2006-02-02 01:21:01 UTC
This issue comes from pjanik's comment in issue 60034

------- Additional comments from pjanik Wed Feb 1 00:57:56 -0800 2006 -------
samphan, james_clark: is Thai to be built as dual installer by default? Right
now, the build process is producing only Thai installation set, not en-US_th...
If so, please file new issue.
-------

So I actually want the (esp. Sun generated) Thai installer to be bilingual by
default.
Comment 6 jjc 2006-02-02 04:04:09 UTC
Clearly it should not be forced: people should be able to generate both Thai
only or multilingual Thai/en_US installation sets.

However, there ought to be some documented value that can be included in the
--with-lang option to configure, such that a top-level dmake will generate a
multilingual Thai/en_US installation set.  It shouldn't be necessary to run a
separate dmake in a subdirectory with an obscure argument in order to get the
normal installation set for a Thai environment.
Comment 7 ingo.schmidt-rosbiegal 2006-02-02 11:36:44 UTC
Ause, do you think you can introduce such a "bilingual" setting?
Comment 8 pavel 2006-02-02 16:21:56 UTC
ause: Hmm, maybe something like

configure --additional-instsets="en-US_th cs_sk"

-> ADDITIONAL_INSTSETS="en-US_th cs_sk"

and

dmake openoffice_en-US_th openoffice_cs_sk in instsetoo_native/util

could be really interesting!
Comment 9 pavel 2006-05-02 15:48:47 UTC
*** Issue 64989 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 10 hjs 2006-05-09 15:06:19 UTC
i don't see much benefit  replaceing the "obscure dmake parameter" with yet
another configure parameter.

if configure passes something like ADDITIONAL_INSTSETS="en-US_th cs_sk", it's of
cause possible to let this do some additional packaging in "instsetoo_native/util".

who is able to provide the configure chamnges?
Comment 11 pavel 2006-05-10 18:43:15 UTC
rene? What do you think about it? Is it worth the effort at all?
Comment 12 hjs 2007-01-09 13:32:42 UTC
anyone stil interested in this issue?
Comment 13 hjs 2007-02-06 12:10:41 UTC
closing due lack of interest...
Comment 14 hjs 2007-02-06 12:11:09 UTC
.
Comment 15 hjs 2007-02-06 12:11:48 UTC
finally closed...