Issue 66389 - Tools/Customize (Draw/Impress) has .uno... strings
Summary: Tools/Customize (Draw/Impress) has .uno... strings
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 50885
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0.3
Hardware: All Windows, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Stephan Bergmann
QA Contact: issues@framework
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-06-13 10:34 UTC by joerg.skottke
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:31 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Warning about corrupted config data in 2.0.2 (25.43 KB, image/jpeg)
2006-06-13 12:33 UTC, joerg.skottke
no flags Details
Warning about corrupted configuration in 2.0.3 (25.25 KB, image/jpeg)
2006-06-13 12:34 UTC, joerg.skottke
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description joerg.skottke 2006-06-13 10:34:01 UTC
Automated test: framework\level1\f_lvl1.tools.bas::tToolsCustomizeKeyboardFunction
Windows 2003 Terminal Server / User installation on so-win

For draw and Impress many entries on the Tools/Customize/Keyboard tabpage do not
have their correct names but those of the underlying UNO slot/function.

E.g. Key = F1, Category = Application, Function = .uno:PackAndGo

There is a grand total of 824 incorrect entries that are OK im SRC680m170
Comment 1 joerg.skottke 2006-06-13 10:34:50 UTC
set OS -> Windows
Comment 2 joerg.skottke 2006-06-13 11:40:59 UTC
There is something funny to this - in some cases the installation appears to go
quite well, in others it fails. 

Maybe this is related to the names of the directories where the office is installed.
Using "StarOffice8_warnings01" fails whereas "warnings01" appears to be ok.
Will investigate further
Comment 3 joerg.skottke 2006-06-13 11:45:48 UTC
It is not related to the underscore, maybe it's just the length of the directory.
To sb.
Comment 4 joerg.skottke 2006-06-13 11:59:51 UTC
Reference m170 shows the same behavior. (even worse)
OOo 2.0.3 is affected as well, going for OOo 2.0.2...
Comment 5 joerg.skottke 2006-06-13 12:12:04 UTC
OOo 2.0.2 is affected as well. Now testing whether this is Terminal Server only ...
Comment 6 joerg.skottke 2006-06-13 12:28:38 UTC
Windows normal intallation comes up with a warning message in both OOo 2.0.2 and
2.0.3, so there is a problem as well.
Comment 7 joerg.skottke 2006-06-13 12:33:18 UTC
Created attachment 37110 [details]
Warning about corrupted config data in 2.0.2
Comment 8 joerg.skottke 2006-06-13 12:34:03 UTC
Created attachment 37111 [details]
Warning about corrupted configuration in 2.0.3
Comment 9 Stephan Bergmann 2006-06-13 13:51:13 UTC
@jsk:  This issue confuses me:

A  On CWS warnings01, there is a problem that certain UI strings are wrong.  On
CWS warnings01, there is no problem with a message box about corrupted
configuration files, right?

B  On plain 2.0.2/2.0.3, when installed in a specific way, there is a problem
with a message box about corrupted configuration files.  In those scenarios, is
there also the problem that certain UI strings are wrong?

C  Is target milestone 2.0.4 justified, or is this 2.X?
Comment 10 joerg.skottke 2006-06-13 14:06:44 UTC
@sb: I'm sort of confused as well. What it boils down to is:

If we install the office to a directory with a long filename we end up with a
corrupted configuration. This happens to 2.0.2, 2.0.3, SRC680m170 and CWS
Warnings01. This is Windows only so far.

On Terminal Server installations we have this plainly visible: In Draw/Impress
toolbars are displayed at random and have lots of icons missing, the menus are
incomplete (84 entries blank) and Tools/Customize/Keyboard has the slotnames
instead of the names of the items (384 occurrences).

Installations on Windows (normal Windows, Userland installation) the warning
appears but the office claims to work ok. We did not go into detail here.

Regarding the target: This is currently discussed, if this is going to be 2.0.4
- or what would be far worse 2.0.3 - or 2.x i don't know yet.
Comment 11 Stephan Bergmann 2006-06-13 14:23:14 UTC
So, the message box about corrupted configuration also appears when doing the
automated test described in this issues initial description?

[Removed "CWS Warnings01" from the summary.]
Comment 12 joerg.skottke 2006-06-13 14:31:23 UTC
No, you found the strange part of the issue. ;-)
This message only appears on "normal" Windows.
Comment 13 Stephan Bergmann 2006-06-15 09:22:16 UTC
.
Comment 14 Stephan Bergmann 2006-07-04 08:08:37 UTC
.
Comment 15 Stephan Bergmann 2008-08-15 12:09:07 UTC
.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 50885 ***
Comment 16 Stephan Bergmann 2008-08-15 12:10:22 UTC
.