Issue 69134 - Incorrect printing for 'Web Layout' document
Summary: Incorrect printing for 'Web Layout' document
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 25680
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: printing (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.0.3
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-08-31 11:22 UTC by cvolsen
Modified: 2006-08-31 13:21 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
web layout document, which does not print correctly (62.00 KB, application/msword)
2006-08-31 11:23 UTC, cvolsen
no flags Details
web layout document, which does not print correctly (75.00 KB, application/msword)
2006-08-31 11:24 UTC, cvolsen
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description cvolsen 2006-08-31 11:22:02 UTC
Opened a MS word document, which had been formated as a "web view/Layout". When
the document was originally opened, in 'Print Layout' mode, the document
displayed as a two page document, which was not displaying the entire contents
of the document. When I changed the view ot 'web layout' I was able to view/edit
the document.

When I to print the document, it would only print 2 pages. This problem occurred
in both 'Print Layout' and 'Web Layout'. When I printed the document from MS
Word, 4 pages were printed.

I would like to send you the offending document, so that you can reproduce the
problem.
Comment 1 cvolsen 2006-08-31 11:23:57 UTC
Created attachment 38871 [details]
web layout document, which does not print correctly
Comment 2 cvolsen 2006-08-31 11:24:22 UTC
Created attachment 38872 [details]
web layout document, which does not print correctly
Comment 3 michael.ruess 2006-08-31 13:20:16 UTC
The document cannot processed correctly because it contains nested tables. This
is not already implemented in OO's MS Word filter. Problem is already tracked as
issue 25680.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 25680 ***
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2006-08-31 13:21:05 UTC
Closing duplicate.