Issue 74915 - wrong chart size destroys page layout
Summary: wrong chart size destroys page layout
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: chart (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: PC All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-02-27 14:06 UTC by joolsr
Modified: 2013-02-24 21:20 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Problematic file - in excel 1st page is fine. in OOchartmilestone 11 still pagination issues (58.50 KB, text/plain)
2007-02-27 14:13 UTC, joolsr
no flags Details
screenshots comparing legend view in excel viewer and OOo (95.00 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.graphics)
2007-06-07 06:50 UTC, Rainer Bielefeld
no flags Details
Drawing showing the difference between chart legend placement in 2.2 and 2.3 (133.79 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.draw)
2007-06-07 10:01 UTC, joolsr
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description joolsr 2007-02-27 14:06:25 UTC
When I load a previously created in Excel file with a chart, we have a
continually occuring incident, with Chart Milestone 11, that the chart still is
taller than the original MS chart. This gives us small but very annoying
pagination issues, where the chart is forced also onto the next page, which
pushes all the other pages out of pagination a little, leading to quite a mess.

The legend used on OO2.1 and before was shown underneath the graph itself,
leading to a slightly taller graph. Now that the legend is in the same place as
Excel it places it on the right hand side, the chart should be the same size as
in Excel.

But the chart still ends up also on the next page.
Comment 1 joolsr 2007-02-27 14:13:17 UTC
Created attachment 43412 [details]
Problematic file - in excel 1st page is fine. in OOchartmilestone 11 still pagination issues
Comment 2 kla 2007-03-02 08:37:02 UTC
set keyword, change Prio and Type, Set Target
@Iha: Maybe its possible to keep in mind for the new implementation.
Comment 3 IngridvdM 2007-03-02 12:08:15 UTC
I raised the prio again as page issues are important for printing.

->Daniel, look at the first chart (Object 1). After import it is bigger(heigher)
than in the original doument and does not fit into the 'Page 1'-region anymore.
Comment 4 Rainer Bielefeld 2007-06-07 06:49:23 UTC
I checked with "2.2.0RC4  German version WIN XP: [680m14(Build9134)]" and can
confirm the problem, pls see my screenshots!

Related to  Issue 46626?

@joolsr 
Pls specify your OS and Platform
Comment 5 Rainer Bielefeld 2007-06-07 06:50:17 UTC
Created attachment 45705 [details]
screenshots comparing legend view in excel viewer and OOo
Comment 6 joolsr 2007-06-07 09:59:17 UTC
I get this same problem using Open Office 2.2.0 on Ubuntu 6.04.

I also get exactly the same problem using Open Office 2.2.0 on Windows 2000.

Interestingly, in OOo 2.3.0 dev on Windows 2000, the legend for the graph is
shown higher up, not the same as Excel's label but much closer in appearance to
it. Unfortunately, the chart still falls off the bottom of the page. I think the
chart height is still the same as before, and oddly (in fact possibly even
worse), the chart y axis is scaled up. ie the y axis takes up more room than
before. I enclose a screenshot to illustrate this better.


I think its important to stress that many of our hundreds of similar excel files
are likewise put together with charts very close to the bottom of the page. Just
a  very slight change in the way the chart is shown means the the chart does
stay on the same page, resulting in a only about 2-3 mm of the bottom part of
the chart being cutoff and shown on the next page. The biggest problem is that
this results in an almost entirely blank page on pg2 with just a few lines of
the chart, resulting in very annoying pagination issues and unwanted almost
blank pages. To users who dont understand the problem, it makes OOo look quite
poor, although the issue is quite small.

Comment 7 joolsr 2007-06-07 10:01:27 UTC
Created attachment 45717 [details]
Drawing showing the difference between chart legend placement in 2.2 and 2.3
Comment 8 Rainer Bielefeld 2007-06-07 10:18:33 UTC
OS due to joolsr's comments
Comment 9 Martin Hollmichel 2008-01-27 07:42:44 UTC
set target to 3.x
Comment 10 IngridvdM 2011-02-18 18:18:55 UTC
I doubt that this problem has something to do with the legend within the chart.
The outer size is the real problem and that is not influenced by the parts
within the chart -> changing summary.