Issue 79834 - unopkg list --version should print version information of installed extensions
Summary: unopkg list --version should print version information of installed extensions
Status: ACCEPTED
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
: 79832 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-07-20 14:17 UTC by joerg.skottke
Modified: 2013-08-07 15:31 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description joerg.skottke 2007-07-20 14:17:50 UTC 
Currently the result is:

[autojsk@tazman program]$ ./unopkg list --version

ERROR: unexpected option --version!
       Use unopkg --help (short -h) to print all options.

Which is perfectly ok - according to the spec. but this is
a) unintuitive
b) an easy, human readable way of retrieving the versions of the installed
extensions is missing anyway.
Comment 1 joachim.lingner 2007-08-27 14:36:56 UTC 
This may be implemented in the future when there is real demand for it.
Comment 2 joachim.lingner 2008-07-14 15:32:12 UTC 
The version is already printed when running unopkg list. If a version is not
supported then the string "Version:" does not appear at all. This could be
changed. Also one could prevent printing out information about all contents of
an extension unless --verbose is used.
Comment 3 joachim.lingner 2009-07-22 12:27:49 UTC 
I reject the additional --version switch. 
When using list with out --verbose then for every extension should only be printed:

Name
Version
Enabled/Disabled

There could be at the end:
Summary: x extensions installed
Comment 4 joachim.lingner 2009-07-22 12:31:30 UTC 
*** Issue 79832 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 joachim.lingner 2009-07-22 12:37:23 UTC 
As name we should use the 
- display name (oxt only)
if it is not provided, then
- identifier (oxt only)
if it is not provided, then
- file name

Don't forget to update the spec!
Comment 6 joachim.lingner 2009-09-01 09:01:24 UTC 
.
Comment 7 joachim.lingner 2010-02-05 12:59:13 UTC 
Retargeting to 3.x.
Comment 8 joachim.lingner 2010-02-05 13:01:16 UTC 
.