Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 80195
scrollbar needed in the notes view
Last modified: 2009-06-26 14:03:17 UTC
NOTE: This bug was originally reported here - https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180389 Tested Builds: Downloaded OOo-Dev_SRC680_m222_LinuxIntel_install_en-US.tar.gz package from: http://openoffice.bouncer.osuosl.org/?product=OOo-Dev&os=linuxintel&lang=en-US&version=SRC680_m222 Problem - The notes view in impress currently shows the slide and the notes all as one page. Thus if you have many notes you are not able to view all your notes and the slide at the same time. In power point the notes are displayed in a separate pane with their own scroll bar. Thus you can scroll down through your notes while leaving the slide still on the screen.
This is an enhancement. In my mind it's a very useful enhancement. Please have a look.
Voting for this. The current behavior also has the following problems - it is completely hellish to try to select the stuff, you have to place the mouse cursor precisely on characters to activate the "text box" that contains the notes - it has margins all around, as if I was taking notes on paper. Huge waste of space or my already tiny screen. If I wanted to take notes by hand, I would be using blank paper or print out the slides, I don't want the drawbacks of paper on my screen when I take notes with a laptop. - it doesn't scroll. Ever tried taking huge amounts of notes on one slide? It will exceed the length of the "page". - every slide needs to be zoomed in/out, scrolled up/down, because of this - I can't edit the slide contents while in "notes mode"!
Agreed, I used impress to produce a presentation for the first time, and it took significantly longer than it would have in powerpoint. Every time i switched to the notes window, I would have to zoom in to see what I was typing. Then when I would peek back at the slide and switch back to notes, it would be zoomed out again.A split window would eliminate this annoying back-and-forth process.
confirmed issue
I don't consider this as an issue which need "requirements" review, reassign.
issue 56172 already is about this *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 56172 ***
closing