Issue 86167 - [64bit] Relation desinger loses display arrangement
Summary: [64bit] Relation desinger loses display arrangement
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Base
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: recent-trunk
Hardware: All Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Frank Schönheit
QA Contact: issues@dba
URL:
Keywords: regression
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-02-18 03:15 UTC by drewjensen.inbox
Modified: 2017-05-20 10:33 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Example bug doc (22.54 KB, application/vnd.sun.xml.base)
2008-02-18 03:16 UTC, drewjensen.inbox 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description drewjensen.inbox 2008-02-18 03:15:31 UTC 
Found using OOH680_m7 x85_64, Kubuntu 7.1 x86_64 Build: 9272 - while testing
Issue# 56898 ( maybe this introduced this )

Open the attached Base file.
Open the Relation designer - note that the disply
Move any table, so that the layout is modified
Save and close the relation designer
Open the relation designer - the layout is gone
Comment 1 drewjensen.inbox 2008-02-18 03:16:32 UTC 
Created attachment 51554 [details]
Example bug doc
Comment 2 drewjensen.inbox 2008-02-18 03:17:01 UTC 
added keyword regression
Comment 3 Frank Schönheit 2008-02-18 07:43:40 UTC 
Cannot reproduce, neither on Linux nor on Windows. Perhaps the 64 bit version
makes a difference here?
Comment 4 drewjensen.inbox 2008-02-18 13:04:47 UTC 
Just tried this on Kubuntu 7.1 32bit (fully updated) and RC1 32bit

No problem

I also tried it on a couple more base files ( 2 new ones and 2 existing ) under
64bit all have the loss of layout with save

Changing OS and Summary
Comment 5 drewjensen.inbox 2008-07-01 11:32:03 UTC 
Checked again w/ DEV300 m_21 (64bit) under Ubuntu 8.04

Problem still persists
Comment 6 drewjensen.inbox 2008-07-01 12:39:50 UTC 
FYI - tried using DEV300 m_21 (32bit) w/ XP - No problem found.
Comment 7 isabelle.hurbain 2008-12-18 18:32:49 UTC 
I confirm this issue on Arch Linux 64bits, OOO300_M9 (build 9358).
Comment 8 ocke.janssen 2011-02-10 08:41:05 UTC 
Could someone test this issue is still true for OOo 3.3?
Comment 9 Martin Hollmichel 2011-03-01 10:37:43 UTC 
yes, I can confirm this for 3.3.
Comment 10 ocke.janssen 2011-03-16 11:43:15 UTC 
Grabbing
Comment 11 ocke.janssen 2011-03-16 11:46:38 UTC 
The problem is that a vcl point x and y are stored which are long values after wards sal_Int32 are read which causes the problem on 64 bit.

Fixed in cws dba34d
Comment 12 ocke.janssen 2011-03-16 12:06:30 UTC 
Changeset
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/dba34d/rev/264f41664021
Comment 13 ocke.janssen 2011-03-17 08:41:50 UTC 
Please review. Thanks.
Comment 14 Frank Schönheit 2011-03-17 09:23:47 UTC 
fs->oj: Will review the fix, if you desire. Other than this, I'll build a 64-bit version of the CWS for Marc to *verify* the fix ;)
Comment 15 Frank Schönheit 2011-03-21 09:24:09 UTC 
seen fixed in CWS dba34d (and stumbled upon bug 117484 while verifying)