Issue 88760 - Opening an 2.3.1 edited doc in 2.4, does show more edited items than original
Summary: Opening an 2.3.1 edited doc in 2.4, does show more edited items than original
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 88406
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: editing (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.4.0
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: michael.ruess
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: needmoreinfo
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-04-26 21:43 UTC by vpanter
Modified: 2008-04-28 10:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Edited document in OOO2.3 (1.13 MB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2008-04-26 21:48 UTC, vpanter
no flags Details
Same edited document but opened in OOo2.4 (1.12 MB, text/plain)
2008-04-26 21:50 UTC, vpanter
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description vpanter 2008-04-26 21:43:17 UTC
I started translating an English document (created in 2.3) using OOo2.3.1nl and
had Changes > Record as well as Changes > Show turned on. I kept the original
English text and added the Dutch text below each paragraph. OOo2.3 recorded
nicely all the Dutch text as changes. So far, so good.
When OOo2.4 was released, I installed OOo2.4nl next to OOo2.3.1NL.
I opened the partly edited document and now part of the English shows as being
modified, which makes the text chaotic.
I work under Windows XP SP2.
2 text attached, one being edited in OOo2.3.1, the other in 2.4

Many thanks for looking into it
Comment 1 vpanter 2008-04-26 21:48:07 UTC
Created attachment 53211 [details]
Edited document in OOO2.3
Comment 2 vpanter 2008-04-26 21:50:29 UTC
Created attachment 53212 [details]
Same edited document but opened in OOo2.4
Comment 3 eric.savary 2008-04-27 22:07:13 UTC
Please tell exactly where the differences appear.
Comment 4 michael.ruess 2008-04-28 10:14:15 UTC
Duplicate of issue 88406.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 88406 ***
Comment 5 michael.ruess 2008-04-28 10:17:49 UTC
Closing duplicate.