Issue 90939 - subscript dominates substitution
Summary: subscript dominates substitution
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: editing (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.4.1
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-06-20 17:27 UTC by tab
Modified: 2013-08-07 14:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
subscripted strings to replace (9.32 KB, text/plain)
2008-06-20 17:28 UTC, tab
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description tab 2008-06-20 17:27:14 UTC
Open x1.odt
0: select 'a+x1', hit b, get b as subscript --unexpected
1: select 'a+x' (which contains no subscript), hit b, get b as subscript; I
expected only the 1 to be subscript.
2: select dd, hit c, get unsubscripted c --inconsistent with 1 and 3; because
not at BOL?
3: select 'mmm', hit n: get n as subscript: the subscript effect was copied from
the 3, but not the font --n is arial, like mmm.
select mmm3, hit k: get k subscript, TimesNewRoman (like the 3)

The parameters (font, size, typeface,  etc) of the 1st char of the selection
should take precedence
May be related to Issues 86697, 86942
Comment 1 tab 2008-06-20 17:28:22 UTC
Created attachment 54643 [details]
subscripted strings to replace
Comment 2 eric.savary 2008-06-22 10:53:17 UTC
@fme: Please have a look.
Comment 3 tab 2009-03-03 17:13:12 UTC
This behaviour is really annoying, persists with v.3.0.1, and is still 'new'.
Did it get forgotten?
Comment 4 tab 2009-03-03 17:15:21 UTC
This behaviour is really annoying, persists with v.3.0.1, and is still 'new'.
Did it get forgotten?